W. K. Jago, R. S. Loffman, and C. A. Motley
Most residents in the Oak Ridge area do not rely on groundwater for potable supplies, although suitable water is available. Local groundwater provides some domestic, municipal, farm, irrigation, and industrial uses, however, and must be viewed as both a potential pathway for exposure to hazardous wastes and as a means for contaminant transport. Statutes codified into regulations by the EPA specifically target the protection of groundwater from contamination by hazardous wastes. The regulations guide groundwater monitoring at the DOE plants in Oak Ridge. Monitoring programs established on the ORR assess groundwater contamination and transport on and off the reservation and are intended to comply with established regulatory requirements.
The groundwater monitoring programs at the ORR gather information to determine the effects of DOE operations on groundwater quality in compliance with all applicable requirements.
The location and movement of groundwater must be determined to identify the extent of contamination in groundwater and to predict the possible fate of contaminants. To make this determination, an understanding is required of how groundwater moves in general and how that movement will be influenced by the geological setting.
7.1.1 Geological Setting
The ORR is located in the Tennessee portion of the Valley and Ridge
Province, which is part of the southern Appalachian fold and thrust
belt. As a result of thrust faulting and varying erosion rates, a series
of parallel valleys and ridges have formed that trend
southwest-northeast.
Two geologic units on the ORR, designated as the Knox Group and the Maynardville Limestone of the Conasauga Group, both consisting of dolostone and limestone, constitute the Knox Aquifer. A combination of fractures and solution conduits in this aquifer control flow over substantial areas, and relatively large quantities of water may move relatively long distances. Active groundwater flow can occur at substantial depths in the Knox Aquifer [300 to 400 ft (91.5 to 122 m)]. The Knox Aquifer is the primary source of groundwater to many streams (base-flow), and most large springs on the ORR discharge from the Knox Aquifer. Yields of some wells penetrating larger solution conduits are reported to exceed 1000 gal/min (3784 L/min).
The remaining geologic units on the ORR (the Rome Formation, the Conasauga Group below the Maynardville Limestone, and the Chickamauga Group) constitute the ORR Aquitards, which consist mainly of siltstone, shale, sandstone, and thinly bedded limestone of low to very low permeability. Nearly all groundwater flow in the aquitards occurs through fractures. The typical yield of a well in the aquitards is less than 1 gal/min (3.8 L/min), and the base flows of streams draining areas underlain by the aquitards are poorly sustained because of such flow rates.
7.1.2 Hydrogeological Setting
7.1.2.1 Groundwater Hydrology
When rain falls, a portion of the rainwater accumulates as groundwater
by soaking into the ground, infiltrating soil and rock. The accumulation
of groundwater in pore spaces of sediments and bedrock creates sources
of usable water, which flows in response to external forces. Groundwater
eventually reappears at the surface in springs, swamps, stream and river
beds, or pumped wells. Thus, groundwater is a reservoir for which the
primary input is recharge from infiltrating rainwater and whose output
is discharge to springs, swamps, rivers, streams, and wells.
Water infiltrates by percolating downward through the pore spaces between sediment grains and also through fractures in bedrock. The smaller the pore spaces or fractures, the slower the flow of water through the subsurface. The physical property that describes the ease with which water may move through the pore spaces and fractures in a given material is called permeability, and it is largely determined by the volume and size of these features and how well they are connected.
As water infiltrates the earth, it travels down through the unsaturated zone, where the pore spaces and fractures are partly filled with water and partly filled with air. Water moving down through the unsaturated zone will eventually reach the saturated zone, where the pore spaces and fractures are completely filled with water. The boundary between the unsaturated and the saturated zones is known as the water table, which generally follows, in subtle form, the contour of the surface topography. Springs, swamps, and beds of streams and rivers are the outcrops of the water table, where groundwater is discharged to the surface.
Because the earth's permeability varies greatly, groundwater flowing through subsurface strata does not travel at a constant rate or without impediment. Strata that transmit water easily (such as those composed primarily of sand) are called aquifers, and strata that restrict water movement (such as clay layers) are called aquitards. An aquifer with an aquitard lying above and beneath it is termed a confined aquifer. Groundwater moves through aquifers toward natural exits, or discharge points, to reappear at the surface.
The direction of groundwater flow through an aquifer system is determined by the permeability of the strata containing the aquifer and by the hydraulic gradient, which is a measure of the difference in hydraulic head over a specified distance. Differences in hydraulic head comprise the driving force for groundwater movement through the saturated zone. The hydraulic head at any given point in an aquifer is a function of the energy associated with the water's elevation above sea level and the pressures exerted on it by surrounding water. Because hydraulic head is not solely a function of elevation, downgradient is not necessarily synonymous with downhill. The downgradient direction will have a horizontal and vertical component, just as a household drain moves wastewater both horizontally and vertically, seeking the lowest point of exit. Aquitards deflect groundwater movement just as drain pipe walls control the direction of wastewater movement. In an aquifer constrained by aquitards such as horizontal clay layers, the downgradient direction tends to be more horizontal than vertical.
Groundwater on the ORR occurs both in the unsaturated zone as transient, shallow subsurface stormflow and within the saturated zone. An unsaturated zone of variable thickness separates the stormflow zone and water table. Adjacent to surface water features or in valley floors, the water table is found at shallow depths and the unsaturated zone is thin. Along the ridge tops or near other high topographic areas, the unsaturated zone is thick, and the water table often lies at considerable depth [15 to 50 m (50 to 175 ft)]. In low-lying areas where the water table occurs near the surface, the stormflow zone and saturated zone are indistinguishable.
Several distinct flow intervals occur within the water table aquifer: the uppermost water table interval; the intermediate interval; the deep interval; and the aquiclude, which is defined by a transition to saline water (Fig. 7.1). The divisions within the saturated zone grade into one another vertically and are not separated by distinct boundaries but reflect an overall decrease in the rate of groundwater flow with depth. Within the ORR aquitards, the greatest groundwater flow rates occur in the stormflow zone and the smallest within the deep zone. Water does not flow in the aquiclude. In the Knox Aquifer, the greatest groundwater flow is in the water table and intermediate intervals [depths to approximately 300 ft (91.5 m)].
As denoted earlier, two broad hydrologic units are identified on the ORR: the Knox Aquifer and the ORR Aquitards, which consist of less permeable geologic units. Figure 7.2 is a generalized map showing surface distribution of the Knox Aquifer and the ORR Aquitards. Many waste areas on the ORR are located in areas underlain by the ORR Aquitards.
7.1.2.2 Unsaturated Zone Hydrology
In undisturbed, naturally vegetated areas on the ORR, about 90% of
the infiltrating precipitation does not reach the water table but
travels through the 1- to 2-m-deep stormflow zone, which approximately
corresponds to the root zone. Because of the permeability contrast
between the stormflow zone and the underlying unsaturated zone, the
stormflow zone partially or completely saturates during rainfall events,
and then water flows laterally, following very short flow paths to
adjacent streams. When the stormflow zone becomes completely saturated,
flow of water over the land occurs. Between rainfall events, as the
stormflow zone drains, flow rates decrease dramatically and water
movement becomes nearly vertical toward the underlying water table.
The rate at which groundwater is transmitted through the stormflow zone is attributed to large pores (root channels, worm bores, and relict fractures). Stormflow is primarily a transport mechanism in undisturbed or vegetated areas, where it intersects shallow waste sources. Most buried wastes are below the stormflow zone; however, in some trenches a commonly observed condition known as ``bathtubbing'' can occur, in which the excavation fills with water and may overflow into the stormflow zone. All stormflow ultimately discharges to streams on the ORR.
7.1.2.3 Saturated Zone Hydrology
As shown in Fig. 7.1, the saturated zone on the ORR can be divided into four vertically
distinct flow zones; an uppermost water table interval, an intermediate
zone, a deep zone, and an aquiclude. Available evidence indicates that
most water in the saturated zone in the aquitards is transmitted through
a 1- to 6-m-thick (3- to 20-ft) layer of closely spaced, well-connected
fractures near the water table (the water table interval) as shown in
Fig. 7.3.
As in the stormflow zone, the bulk of groundwater in the saturated zone resides within the pore spaces of the rock matrix. The rock matrix typically forms blocks that are bounded by fractures. Contaminants in the fractures typically occur in higher concentrations than in the matrix; thus, the contaminants tend to move (diffuse) into the matrix. This process, termed diffusive exchange, between water in matrix pores and water in adjacent fractures reduces the overall contaminant migration rates relative to groundwater flow velocities. For example, the leading edge of a geochemically nonreactive contaminant mass such as tritium may migrate along fractures at a typical rate of 3 ft/day (1 m/day); however, the center of mass of a contaminant plume typically migrates at a rate less than 0.2 ft/day (0.66 m/day).
In the aquitards, chemical characteristics of groundwater change from mixed-cation-HCO3 water type at shallow depth to a Na-HCO3 water type at deeper levels. This transition, not marked by a distinct change in rock properties, serves as a useful marker and can be used to distinguish the more active water table and intermediate groundwater intervals from the sluggish flow of the deep interval. There is evidence of similar change with depth in the chemical characteristics of water in the Knox Aquifer. Although the mechanism responsible for this change in water types is not quantified, it most likely is related to the amount of time the water is in contact with a specific type of rock.
Most groundwater flow in the saturated zone occurs within the water table interval. Most flow is through weathered, permeable fractures and matrix rock and within solution conduits in the Knox Aquifer. The range of seasonal fluctuations in depth to the water table and in rates of groundwater flow varies significantly across the reservation. In areas underlain by the Knox Aquifer, seasonal fluctuations in water levels average 5.3 m (17 ft), and mean discharge from the active groundwater zone is typically 85 gal/min (322 L/min) per square mile. In the aquitards of BCV, Melton Valley, East Fork Valley, and Bethel Valley, seasonal fluctuations in water levels average 5 ft (1.5 m) and typical mean discharge is 26 gal/min (98 L/min) per square mile.
In the intermediate interval, groundwater flow paths are a product of fracture density and orientation. In this interval, groundwater movement occurs primarily in permeable fractures that are poorly connected. In the Knox Aquifer a few cavity systems and fractures control groundwater movement in this zone, but in the aquitards the bulk of flow is through fractures along which permeability may be increased by weathering.
The deep interval of the saturated zone is delineated by a change to a Na-HCO3 water type. Hydrologically active fractures in the deep interval are significantly fewer in number and shorter in length than in the other intervals, and the spacing is greater. Wells finished in the deep interval of the ORR aquitards typically yield less than 0.3 gal/min (1.1 L/min) and thus are barely adequate for water supply.
In the aquitards, saline water characterized by total dissolved solids ranging up to 2.75 � 105 mg/L and chlorides generally in excess of 5 � 104 mg/L (ranging up to 1.63 � 105 mg/L) lies beneath the deep interval of the groundwater zone, delineating an aquiclude. Chemically, this water resembles brines typical of major sedimentary basins, but its origin is not known. The chemistry suggests extremely long residence times (i.e., very low flow rates) and little or no mixing with shallow groundwater.
The aquiclude has been encountered at depths of 125 and 244 m (400 and 800 ft) in Melton and Bethel valleys, respectively (near ORNL), and it is believed to approach 305 m (1000 ft) in portions of BCV (near the Y-12 Plant) underlain by aquitard formations. Depth to the aquiclude in areas of the Knox Aquifer is not known but is believed to be greater than 366 m (1200 ft); depth to the aquiclude has not been established in the vicinity of the K-25 Site.
7.1.3 Groundwater Flow
Many factors influence groundwater flow on the ORR. Topography, surface
cover, geologic structure, and rock type exhibit especially strong
influence on the hydrogeology. Variations in these features result in
variations of the total amount of groundwater moving through the system
(flux). (Average flux rates for the aquitards and the Knox Aquifer
formations are shown in Fig. 7.1.) As an example, the overall decrease in open fracture density with
depth results in a decreased groundwater flux with depth.
Topographic relief on the ORR is such that most active subsurface groundwater flow occurs at shallow depths. U.S. Geological Survey modeling (Tucci 1992 ) suggests that 95% of all groundwater flow occurs in the upper 15 to 30 m (50 to 100 ft) of the saturated zone in the aquitards. As a result, flow paths in the active-flow zones (particularly in the aquitards) are relatively short, and nearly all groundwater discharges to local surface water drainages on the ORR. Conversely, in the Knox Aquifer, it is believed that solution conduit flow paths may be considerably longer, perhaps as much as 1.6 km (2 miles) long in the along-strike direction. No evidence at this time substantiates the existence of any deep, regional flow off the ORR or between basins within the ORR in either the Knox Aquifer or the aquitards. Data collected in CY 1994 and 1995, however, has demonstrated that groundwater flow and contaminant transport occur off of the ORR in the intermediate interval of the Knox Aquifer, near the east end of the Y-12 Plant.
Migration rates of contaminants transported in groundwater are strongly influenced by natural chemical and physical processes in the subsurface (including diffusion and adsorption). Peak concentrations of solutes, including contaminants such as tritium moving from a waste area, for instance, can be delayed for several to many decades in the aquitards, even along flow paths as short as a few hundred feet. The processes that naturally retard contaminant migration and store contaminants in the subsurface are less effective in the Knox Aquifer than in the aquitards because of rapid flow along solution features allowing minimal time for diffusion to occur.
7.1.4 Groundwater Monitoring Considerations
Because of the complexity of the hydrogeologic framework on the ORR,
groundwater flow and, therefore, contaminant transport are difficult to
predict on a local scale. Consequently, individual plume delineation is
not always feasible on the ORR. Stormflow and most groundwater discharge
to the surface water drainages on the ORR. For that reason, monitoring
springs, seeps, and surface water quality is one of the best ways to
assess the extent to which groundwater from a large portion of the ORR
transports contaminants; however, contaminant transport may occur at
depth as well. The center of mass of the
VOC plume in the Maynardville
Limestone east of the Y-12 Plant lies at a depth of 300 ft
(91.5 m). Transport of the highest VOC concentrations occurs in
this interval because VOCs are more dense than water, and there is
little dilution.
7.1.5 Off-Site Spring and Residential Well Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring of residential wells and springs in the vicinity
of the ORR is summarized in Sect. 55. .
7.1.6 Groundwater Monitoring Program on the ORR
The groundwater surveillance monitoring programs implemented at the DOE
facilities have been designed to obtain full compliance with regulatory
requirements and to meet objectives. Site-specific regulatory monitoring
programs are supported technically by site characterization and regional
studies of the geohydrologic and chemical aspects of the flow system.
QC procedures for every aspect
of data collection and analysis have been established, and data bases
are used to organize and report analytical results.
Thus, the groundwater surveillance monitoring program for the ORR, while disposal site- and facility-specific, contains a number of common components that are interrelated and coordinated to allow both time- and cost-effective project management.
7.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT THE Y-12 PLANT
7.2.1 Background and Regulatory Setting
Most of the groundwater monitoring at the
Y-12 Plant is conducted
within the scope of a single, comprehensive groundwater monitoring
program, which included the following elements in 1995:
Through incorporation of these multiple considerations, the comprehensive monitoring program at the Y-12 Plant addresses multiple regulatory considerations and technical objectives. It eliminates redundancy between different regulatory programs and ensures consistent data collection and evaluation.
More than 200 sites have been identified at the Y-12 Plant that represent known or potential sources of contamination to the environment as a result of past waste management practices. These sites are being addressed either by the ER Program under exclusively CERCLA programs or a combination of CERCLA and RCRA regulations. The ER Program and Y-12 Plant management share responsibilities for sites regulated under dual CERCLA and RCRA drivers.
A number of the inactive waste management sites were grouped in 1992 into OUs under CERCLA as part of an FFA negotiated between EPA, TDEC, and DOE. Two types of OUs were identified: (1) source OUs consisting of sites or groups of sites that were known sources of contamination to the environment and (2) integrator OUs consisting of media, such as groundwater, soils, and surface water, that had been impacted by the source OUs. RI/FS activities were initiated for these OUs; however, as these activities progressed, it became evident that administrative separation of source and integrator OUs was not a technically feasible approach to ER because contamination from numerous source OUs had mingled and integrator OUs had been impacted significantly by multiple source OUs. As a result, distinction of the nature and extent of contamination, risk, and evaluation of remedial actions for individual source OUs was not practicable. An agreement was reached among regulatory agencies and DOE in 1994 to proceed with an integrated RI/FS strategy. In the integrated strategy, former source OUs and integrator OUs are addressed concurrently in a characterization area (CA) defined by physical limits, such as watershed boundaries and/or groundwater flow regimes (Fig. 7.4). Specific sites or locations of high risk or concern within the CA are targeted for focused, rapid remedial actions, while a general remedial strategy and/or administrative controls for the CA progresses. Individual focused actions are designated as OUs and documented under separate RODs.
Two CAs incorporating 27 known source units have been established for the Y-12 Plant, the UEFPC CA and the Bear Creek Valley (BCV) CA.
In addition, four individual source OUs remain on Chestnut Ridge, where available data indicate that contamination from each unit is distinct and separable. The remaining sites have been grouped into Y-12 Plant study areas that constitute lower-priority units that will be investigated under CERCLA as preliminary assessment/site investigations (PA/SIs). New OUs or additions to existing CAs will be made if the degree of contamination determined by the PA/SI warrants further study under an RI/FS.
Postclosure maintenance, monitoring, and reporting requirements of RCRA also apply to seven inactive CERCLA-regulated units that meet the definition of RCRA hazardous waste TSD facilitates. These units include the S-3 Site, portions of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds, Oil Landfarm, New Hope Pond, Chestnut Ridge Security Pits, Chestnut Ridge Sediment Disposal Basin, and Kerr Hollow Quarry. Postclosure requirements will be outlined in RCRA postclosure permits currently being issued by TDEC. These requirements will be integrated with CERCLA programs. Corrective actions addressing contaminant releases will be deferred to the CERCLA RI/FS process.
Additional primary regulatory drivers for groundwater monitoring at the Y-12 Plant are the TDEC regulations governing nonhazardous solid waste disposal facilities (SWDFs) and TDEC regulations governing petroleum USTs. Two facilities (Centralized Sanitary Landfill II and Industrial Landfill IV) have been subject to groundwater monitoring under the SWDF regulations since the late 1980s. Construction of three additional landfill facilities was completed between 1993 and 1994 (Industrial Landfill V, Construction/Demolition Landfill VI, and Construction/Demolition Landfill VII). Baseline groundwater monitoring has been completed for all SWDFs, and all of the sites are now under a semiannual detection monitoring program. Groundwater monitoring to support the petroleum UST program at the Y-12 Plant has progressed past the assessment phase into the corrective action phase, which requires only limited monitoring.
Specific regulatory requirements do not address all groundwater monitoring concerns at the Y-12 Plant. Selected areas where contamination is most likely to migrate to potential exposure points off of the ORR are monitored as part of DOE Order 5400.1 exit-pathway monitoring. Also, monitoring is performed as part of DOE 5400.1 surveillance monitoring in general areas not specifically regulated and not representing specific exit pathways off of the reservation, such as a large part of the industrialized portion of the Y-12 Plant. Surveillance monitoring is conducted to monitor contaminant plume boundaries and to trend contaminant concentrations specifically to augment regulatory and exit-pathway monitoring programs. Best management practice monitoring is conducted at a number of selected sites or locations either at the request of internal organizations, the TDEC/DOE Oversight Division, or in lieu of regulatory required monitoring at active facilities.
7.2.2 Hydrogeologic Setting and Summary of Groundwater Quality
In the comprehensive monitoring program, the Y-12 Plant is divided
into three hydrogeologic regimes delineated by surface water drainage
patterns, topography, and groundwater flow characteristics. The regimes
are further defined by the waste sites they contain. These regimes
include the Bear Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (Bear Creek regime), the
Upper East Fork Poplar Hydrogeologic Regime (East Fork regime), and the
Chestnut Ridge Hydrogeologic Regime (Chestnut Ridge regime) (Fig. 7.5). Most of the Bear Creek and East Fork regimes are underlain by the ORR
aquitards. The extreme southern portion of these two regimes is
underlain by the Maynardville Limestone, which is part of the Knox
Aquifer. The entire Chestnut Ridge regime is underlain by the Knox
Aquifer.
In general, groundwater flow in the water table interval follows topography. Shallow groundwater flow in the Bear Creek and East Fork regimes is divergent from a topographic and groundwater table divide located near the western end of the Y-12 Plant. Shallow groundwater flow directions east and west of the divide are predominantly easterly and westerly, respectively. This divide defines the boundary between the Bear Creek and Chestnut Ridge regimes. In addition, flow converges toward the primary surface streams from Pine Ridge to the north and Chestnut Ridge to the south of the Y-12 Plant. In the Chestnut Ridge regime, a groundwater table divide exists that approximately coincides with the crest of the ridge. Shallow groundwater flow, therefore, tends to be toward either flank of the ridge, with discharge primarily to surface streams and springs located in Bethel Valley to the south and BCV to the north.
In BCV, groundwater in the intermediate and deep intervals moves predominantly through fractures in the ORR aquitards, converging toward and moving through fractures and solution conduits in the Maynardville Limestone. Karst development in the Maynardville Limestone has a significant impact on groundwater flow paths in the water table and intermediate intervals. In general, groundwater flow parallels geologic strike. Groundwater flow rates in BCV vary widely; they are very slow within the deep interval of the ORR aquitards but can be quite rapid within solution conduits in the Maynardville Limestone. The rate of groundwater flow perpendicular to geologic strike from the ORR aquitards to the Maynardville Limestone has not been well established. Several investigations are currently under way or planned to attempt to identify how quickly groundwater beneath waste sites over the ORR aquitards moves to the Maynardville Limestone. Recent data obtained as part of hydrologic studies in the Bear Creek regime suggest that strike-parallel transport of some contaminants can occur within the ORR aquitards for significant distances. Continuous elevated levels of nitrate within the ORR aquitards are now known to extend west from the S-3 Site for a distance of about 3000 ft, approximately twice the previous estimates. VOCs at source units in the ORR aquitards, however, tend to remain close to source areas because they tend to adsorb to the bedrock matrix, diffuse into pore spaces within the matrix, and degrade prior to migrating to exit pathways, where rapid transport for long distances can occur.
Groundwater flow in the Chestnut Ridge regime is almost exclusively through fractures and solution conduits in the Knox Group. Discharge points for intermediate and deep flow are not well known. Groundwater is currently presumed to flow primarily toward BCV to the north and Bethel Valley to the south. Groundwater from intermediate and deep zones may discharge at certain spring locations along the flanks of Chestnut Ridge. Along the crest of the ridge, water table elevations decrease from west to east, implying an overall easterly trend in groundwater flow.
Historical monitoring efforts have shown that groundwater quality at the Y-12 Plant has been affected by four types of contaminants: nitrate, VOCs, metals, and radionuclides. Of these, nitrate and VOCs are the most widespread, although data obtained since 1988 suggest that the extent of some radionuclides may also be significant, particularly in the Bear Creek regime. Trace metals, the least extensive groundwater contaminants, generally occur in a small area of low-pH groundwater at the west end of the Y-12 Plant, in the vicinity of the S-3 Site. Data obtained as a result of previous monitoring efforts show that contaminant plumes from multiple source units have mixed with one another and that contaminants (other than nitrate) are no longer easily associated with a single source.
7.2.3 1995 Well Installation and Plugging and Abandonment Activities
The monitoring objectives for the wells at the Y-12 Plant are
divided into four categories: Category I wells, to obtain
additional data to delineate the extent of groundwater contamination;
Category II wells, to monitor potential exit pathways for
groundwater contamination; Category III wells, as new or
replacement wells for compliance monitoring; and Category IV wells,
under the direction of the Y-12 Plant ER Program, to obtain
specific data required for CERCLA remedial investigations
(RIs). In 1995, two new
Category I groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the Bear
Creek regime to monitor contamination migration within the ORR
Aquitards.
The Y-12 Plant GWPP conducts well plugging and abandonment activities as part of an overall program to maintain the Y-12 Plant monitoring well network. Wells that are damaged beyond rehabilitation, interfere with planned construction activities, or for which no useful data can be obtained, are selected for plugging and abandonment. In 1995, 55 wells were plugged and abandoned. A majority of these wells were located in the extreme western portion of the Bear Creek regime. The wells were plugged and abandoned because of poor condition, historical lack of security or identity, or no identifiable future use.
7.2.4 1995 Monitoring Programs
Groundwater monitoring in 1995 addressed multiple requirements from
regulatory drivers, DOE orders, Y-12 Plant ER programs, and
best management practices. Table 7.1 contains a summary of monitoring activities conducted by the
Y-12 Plant GWPP, as well as the programmatic requirements that
apply to each site.
Figure 7.6 shows the locations of ORR perimeter monitoring stations as specified in the EMP.
Detailed data reporting for monitoring activities conducted by the Y-12 Plant GWPP is contained within the 1995 annual groundwater quality reports for each hydrogeologic regime (Energy Systems 1996a , 1996b , and 1996c ). Details of small-scale monitoring efforts performed by organizations other than the Y-12 Plant GWPP specifically for CERCLA OUs are published in RI reports.
The East Fork Regime contains the UEFPC CA, which consists of source
units, surface water, and groundwater components of the hydrogeologic
system within the East Fork regime and Union Valley to the east of the
Y-12 Plant. Numerous sources of contamination to both surface water
and groundwater exist within the plant area. Chemical constituents from
the S-3 Site dominate groundwater contamination in the western
portion of the UEFPC CA. In addition to potential surface water and
groundwater contamination sources identified as OUs, most of the
potentially contaminated units making up the Y-12 study areas are within
the East Fork regime. Potential surface-water contamination associated
with the storm sewer system and East Fork mercury use areas is of
primary interest and will also be addressed in the UEFPC CA RI/FS.
The extent of the nitrate plume is essentially defined in the
unconsolidated zone and the shallow bedrock zone. In both zones, the
nitrate plume extends about 2500 ft (762.5 m) eastward from
the S-3 Site to just downgradient of the S-2 Site. Nitrate has
traveled farthest in groundwater in the Maynardville Limestone.
Concentrations of VOCs in most of the East Fork regime have remained
relatively constant since 1988 (Fig. 7.9 ). Some monitoring locations (e.g., GW-220 and GW-733) on the
eastern end of the regime, east of New Hope Pond, have shown increasing
VOC concentrations, indicative of an easterly movement of part of the
plume (Fig. 7.10). Data show that VOCs are the most extensive laterally in the shallow
groundwater; however, data indicate that once contaminants migrate into
the Maynardville Limestone, they tend to concentrate at depths between
100 and 500 ft. The highest VOC concentrations appear to be between
200 and 500 ft, as exemplified by vertical carbon tetrachloride
distribution at the east end of the Y-12 Plant (Fig. 7.11).
The 1995 monitoring results generally confirm findings from the previous
4 years of monitoring. A continuous dissolved VOC plume in
groundwater in the bedrock zone extends eastward from the S-3 Site
over the entire length of the regime (Fig. 7.12). Additionally, the 1995 data confirm previous results identifying the
Waste Coolant Processing Facility area as a VOCs source area. Pockets of
VOCs also are present in groundwater at the Building 9754 and
9754-2 fuel facilities and upgradient of New Hope Pond. Data from the
East Fork regime surveillance monitoring network show that a major
source area also lies within process areas in the central portion of the
plant.
Chloroethene compounds (perchloroethene, trichloroethene,
dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride) tend to dominate the VOC plume
composition in the western and central portions of the Y-12 Plant.
However, perchloroethene and isomers of dichloroethene are almost
ubiquitous throughout the extent of the VOC plume, indicating many
source areas. Chloromethane compounds (carbon tetrachloride, chloroform,
and methylene chloride) are the predominant VOCs in the eastern and
southeastern portions of the plant.
Groundwater with gross alpha activity greater than 15 pCi/L occurs
in scattered areas throughout the East Fork regime (Fig. 7.13). Historical data collected about 5 years ago show that gross
alpha activity exceeding the
MCL for drinking water (annual
average activity level of 15 pCi/L) is most extensive in
groundwater in the unconsolidated zone in the western portion of the
Y-12 Plant. Surveillance data collected from several wells in the
western portion of the Y-12 Plant during 1995 show that gross alpha
(and gross beta) activity levels remained elevated well above the MCL
(wells GW-108, GW-109, GW-274, GW-275, and GW-782). Previous
monitoring results have also suggested an area of elevated gross alpha
activity west of New Hope Pond. Monitoring results during 1995 confirmed
that gross alpha activity remains elevated above MCLs in the
southeastern portions of the Y-12 Plant (wells GW-154, GW-222,
and GW-605). Sporadic gross alpha activity was also observed in several
shallow wells scattered across the East Fork regime, notably in exit
pathway well GW-169 in Union Valley (Fig. 7.13). Erratic data distribution, coupled with high turbidity and total
suspended solids content in samples from most of the wells, indicates
that these sporadic values are false positives.
Elevated gross beta activity in groundwater in the East Fork regime
shows a pattern similar to that observed for gross alpha activity
(Fig. 7.14). In general, gross beta activity consistently exceeds the annual
average MCL of 50 pCi/L in groundwater in the western portion of
the regime, with the primary source being the S-3 Site. Monitoring
data collected in 1995 showed annual average gross beta activity greater
than the MCL near the Salvage Yard and Rust Garage (wells GW-108,
GW-109, GW-274, and GW-275). Also, consistent with historical patterns,
elevated gross beta was observed in an area immediately west of New Hope
Pond within the Maynardville Limestone. Elevated sporadic gross beta
activity observed in 1994 in off-site exit-pathway wells GW-169 and
GW-170, located in Union Valley, was not observed during 1995.
Chemical water quality data from exit-pathway wells monitored in 1993
provided the first strong indication that VOCs are being transported off
the ORR through the Maynardville Limestone at depths of approximately
100 to 300 ft (30.5 to 91.5 m). Sporadic occurrences of common
chlorinated solvents, carbon tetrachloride and tetrachloroethene, above
DWSs were confirmed at a depth of 160 ft (49 m) in both
on-site and off-site wells (wells GW-170 and GW-733, Figs. 7.11 and 7.12). Well GW-170 is located approximately 1500 ft (458 m)
east of the eastern ORR boundary. This off-site well also contained
chloroform and trichloroethene, although below the MCLs for these two
compounds. Two additional wells at the same location as Well GW-170
have also been sampled quarterly since 1990. Well GW-169 is
approximately 40 ft (12.2 m) deep. Only trace levels of VOCs
continue to be observed in this well; one sample for trichloroethene was
slightly above the MCL in 1991. Carbon tetrachloride and chloroform have
not been present above detection levels in this shallow well.
Well GW-232 is approximately 400 ft (122 m) deep. No VOCs
have been detected in this well. Carbon tetrachloride has also been
detected at low levels in spring station SCR 7.1SP, located east of
Well GW-170. Several VOCs were also observed at low levels in a
spring located along South Illinois Avenue (SCR 7.8SP). Low levels
of 1,2-dichloroethene have also been detected at Well GW-230,
located east of South Illinois Avenue, which may or may not be connected
to Y-12 Plant operations.
The concentration trend for carbon tetrachloride, the primary
contaminant of concern, in both wells GW-170 and GW-733 is illustrated
in Fig. 7.10. An areal distribution of VOCs is shown in Fig. 7.12. The data to date indicate that VOC transport is occurring at depth
within the Maynardville Limestone and is restricted to that formation. A
vertical profile of VOC contamination was obtained from a multiport
monitoring well (GW-722), near the eastern boundary of the ORR
(Fig. 7.6). The data show that the highest VOC concentrations occurred at
depths between 200 and 500 ft (61 and 152.5 m) below ground
surface (Fig. 7.11 ). VOC concentrations are highest at these depths because most
dilution and mixing with rainwater occurs in the shallow portions of the
Maynardville Limestone. VOCs have not been observed in exit-pathway
wells drilled to a variety of depths in the ORR aquitards north of
Well GW-733. Conversely, VOCs have not been observed at
concentrations exceeding MCLs in several wells located south of
Well GW-733 in the Knox Aquifer.
VOC data were obtained for the first time in 1994 from two sampling
points near Lake Reality: a dewatering sump (LRS, Fig. 7.7) located just east of the site and groundwater seeps north of the site
within the emergency overflow spillway (LRSPW, Fig. 7.7). These samples contained VOCs (in particular carbon tetrachloride),
indicating that groundwater may be moving preferentially through
permeable fill zones beneath a concrete-lined diversion channel for
UEFPC . The sump was originally installed in 1990 to prevent the
bottom liner for Lake Reality from floating as a result of upward
hydrostatic pressure. The sump was intermittently active during 1992 and
1993, and was deactivated in mid-1994 because of concerns that it was
inducing shallow groundwater flow to the north. The sump had to be
reactivated in CY 1995.
Monitoring of the groundwater seepage in the overflow spillway continued
in 1995 to determine whether any trends in VOC levels resulted from
deactivation of the sump. Results indicate that VOC levels did increase
during periods of sump operation. In addition, VOC levels in well GW-220
(Fig. 7.12 ) located south of the sump have increased over time and the sump
is documented as having a significant [approximate radius of
1000 ft (305 m)] zone of influence on groundwater table
levels. Therefore, sump operation has been kept to minimal levels with
monitoring of discharge when operation is required.
An interim study, described in the 1994
ASER, was completed in the
fall of 1994. Monitoring of wells and selected springs and surface water
stations continued during 1995. Based on the results of the interim
study, immediate actions to remediate or intercept groundwater were
deemed unwarranted. An interim proposed plan defining administrative
controls and public notification has been drafted and submitted to
regulatory agencies for review and comment. Additional investigations
and any long-term remedial actions in this area will be addressed in
conjunction with DOE, TDEC, EPA, and the public as the RI/FS for the
UEFPC CA progresses.
A major milestone in the environmental remediation process occurred for
the Bear Creek regime in 1995. With completion of the CERCLA RI for
the BCV CA and completion of RCRA postclosure permits as discussed
below, characterization of the nature and extent of contamination in the
regime is essentially complete. TDEC and EPA have concurred that
sufficient data exist in general to proceed with the next step in the
process: risk assessment, evaluation, and selection of remedial
alternatives and/or administrative controls.
All baseline RI field activities under the scope of the BCV CA were
completed in August 1995. The RI-generated results and conclusions
have been integrated into a draft RI report, which is in the process of
being finalized. As the next step in the CERCLA process, remedial
actions under the scope of a feasibility study will be initiated where
sufficient data exist to conduct risk assessments and evaluate
alternatives. Where data gaps exist preventing full evaluation of
remedial alternatives, focused studies with limited scopes and short
durations will be completed to obtain the specific, required data.
Under RCRA, all interim-status assessment monitoring was discontinued by
September 1995 upon issuance of the final modifications to the
postclosure permit for the Bear Creek regime. The focus of monitoring
efforts changed to postclosure corrective action monitoring, exit
pathway monitoring, and surveillance of contaminant plume boundaries.
These objectives were met by formulating a composite monitoring of
65 wells, 9 springs, and 6 surface water locations
specified by the RCRA postclosure permit, the ORR EMP, and primary
exit-pathway and surveillance-monitoring points. This composite of
locations represents a stable, long-term corrective action/surveillance
monitoring network for the regime. The network will be sampled at a
baseline semiannual frequency. Any monitoring requirements dictated by
CERCLA RODs issued for the BCV CA will be integrated into the long-term
corrective action/surveillance-monitoring network for the regime.
Contaminant plume boundaries are essentially defined in the bedrock
formations that directly underlie many waste disposal areas in the Bear
Creek regime, particularly the Nolichucky Shale. The elongated shape of
the contaminant plumes in the Bear Creek regime is the result of
preferential transport of the contaminants parallel to strike in both
the Knox Aquifer and the ORR aquitards. A review of historical data
suggests that, in general, contaminant concentrations in the Bear Creek
regime, within the ORR aquitards, have remained relatively constant
since 1986. Certain contaminants at specific sites, however, have shown
non-steady-state concentration patterns, as detailed in the 1992 ORR
environmental report (Energy
Systems 1993b
). The same trends have been observed in exit-pathway wells located in
the Bear Creek regime (Fig. 7.17), with slight increases or decreases observed for selected
contaminants.
Data obtained during 1995 indicate that nitrate concentrations exceed
the 10 mg/L MCL in an area that extends west from the S-3 Site
for several thousand feet down BCV (Fig. 7.8). Nitrate concentrations greater than 100 mg/L extend about
3000 ft (915 m) west of the S-3 Site. During 1995, the
highest nitrate concentrations continued to be seen adjacent to the
S-3 Site in groundwater in the unconsolidated zone and at shallow
depths [less than 100 ft (30.5 m) below the ground surface] in
the Nolichucky Shale.
The horizontal extent of the nitrate plume is essentially defined in
groundwater in the upper part of the aquifer [less than 200 ft
(61 m) below the ground surface]. Data obtained from exit-pathway
monitoring wells installed during 1991 and 1992 suggest that the nitrate
plume in groundwater within bedrock in the Maynardville Limestone
extends about 12,000 ft (3,660 m) west along BCV, which is
consistent with CY 1993 and CY 1994 data.
Vertical plume boundaries are not so well defined. Typically, nitrate
concentrations exceed the MCL in groundwater in the upper 300 ft
(91.5 m) of the Maynardville Limestone. Below this depth nitrate
concentrations exceed 10 mg/L in an area immediately down-dip
(south) of the S-3 Site. Data obtained since 1986 suggest that the
nitrate plume extends more than 600 ft (183 m) below the
ground surface within the ORR aquitards at the S-3 Site.
Based on the 1995 data, barium was consistently reported
(\math{>}50% of samples) for samples from Well GW-537 and wells at
the S-3 Site. Cadmium was consistently detected above its maximum
contaminant level samples from well GW-042 (a background well in the
Bear Creek Burial Grounds) and well GW-276 at the S-3 Site waste
management area (Fig. 7.15).
Other trace metal contaminants in the Bear Creek regime are beryllium,
boron, cobalt, copper, nickel, strontium, and uranium. Concentrations of
these metals have commonly exceeded background levels in groundwater
near the S-3 Site, Bear Creek Burial Grounds, and Oil Landfarm waste
management areas. Selected stream and spring locations and exit-pathway
study wells also have exhibited total uranium and strontium
concentrations above background values.
Groundwater in the unconsolidated zone that contains detectable levels
of VOCs occurs primarily within about 1000 ft (305 m) of the
source areas. The highest VOC concentrations (greater than
10,000 mg/L) in the unconsolidated zone occur at the Bear Creek
Burial Grounds waste management area.
The extent of the dissolved VOC plumes is slightly greater in the
underlying bedrock. Although the plumes generally do not extend more
than 1000 ft from the source areas in groundwater in the
low-permeability formations that underlie many waste sites, significant
transport of the VOCs has occurred in the Maynardville Limestone.
Data obtained from exit-pathway monitoring locations show that in the
vicinity of the water table, an apparently continuous dissolved VOC
plume extends for about 12,000 ft (3,660 m) westward from the
S-3 Site to just west of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds waste
management area. The highest levels of VOCs in the Bear Creek regime
occur in bedrock, just south of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds Waste
Management Area. Historical levels have been as high as 7000 mg/L
in groundwater near the source area. Typical VOC levels in the exit
pathway (Maynardville Limestone) range from about 160 �g/L in the
eastern part of the regime (well GW-725, Fig. 7.12) to less than detectable levels in the western part of the regime.
Evaluations of the extent of these radionuclides in groundwater in the
Bear Creek regime during 1995 were based primarily on measurements of
gross alpha activity and gross beta activity. If the annual average
gross alpha activity in groundwater samples from a well exceeded
15 pCi/L (the MCL for gross alpha activity), then one or more of
the alpha-emitting radionuclides were assumed to be present in the
groundwater monitored by the well. A similar rationale was used for
annual average gross beta activity that exceeded 50 pCi/L.
As shown in Fig. 7.13, groundwater with elevated levels of gross alpha activity occurs in the
water table interval in the vicinity of the S-3 Site, the Bear
Creek Burial Grounds, and the Oil Landfarm waste management areas. In
the bedrock interval, gross alpha activity exceeds 15 pCi/L in
groundwater in the Nolichucky Shale near the S-3 Site, the southern
sides of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds, and east of the Oil Landfarm
waste management areas. Data obtained from exit-pathway monitoring
stations show that gross alpha activity in groundwater in the
Maynardville Limestone exceeds the maximum contamination level for
10,000 ft (3,050 m) west of the S-3 Site. Elevated gross
alpha activities were observed in four exit-pathway spring and stream
monitoring locations (NT-01, SS-1, SS-4, and SS-5; Fig. 7.13).
The distribution of gross beta radioactivity in groundwater in the
unconsolidated zone is similar to that of gross alpha radioactivity
(Fig. 7.14). During 1995 gross beta activity exceeded 50 pCi/L within the
water table interval in the Maynardville Limestone from south of the
S-3 Site to the Oil Landfarm waste management area. Within the
intermediate bedrock interval in the Maynardville Limestone, the
elevated gross beta activity extends as far west as does gross alpha
activity, just to the west of the Bear Creek Burial Grounds waste
management area. Elevated gross beta activity was observed in two
springs and one stream monitoring station (NT-01, SS-1, and SS-4;
Fig. 7.14) that also exhibited elevated gross alpha activity.
Exit-pathway study activities in 1995 consisted of continued monitoring
at four well transects (pickets). The 1992 ORR environmental report and
(Shevenell et
al. 1992
) contain detailed information about the construction of these pickets
and the rationale for their construction. Other related investigations
initiated as part of exit-pathway studies have included evaluation of
the geologic characteristics of the Maynardville Limestone, geochemical
characterization of groundwater types in BCV, analysis of controlling
variables for development of preferred groundwater flow paths, and
cross-borehole testing. Studies are ongoing of the transport of
contaminants adsorbed to colloidal particles and of contaminant
transport in relation to rainfall events within the Maynardville
Limestone.
Groundwater quality data obtained during 1995 from the exit-pathway
monitoring wells confirmed previous data that contaminated groundwater
does not seem to occur much beyond the western side of the Bear Creek
Burial Grounds waste management area.
Surface water and spring samples collected during CY 1995
(Fig. 7.16) indicate that spring discharges and water in upper reaches of
Bear Creek contain many of the compounds found in the groundwater;
however, the concentrations in the creek and spring discharges decrease
rapidly with distance downstream of the waste disposal sites. This
assessment is consistent with data from previous years. CY 1995
data indicate an improvement in water quality in the lower reaches of
Bear Creek over past years.
For example, in CY 1995, nitrate concentrations in Bear Creek
exceeded 100 mg/L during 1995 from NT-01 west of the S-3 Site
to BCK 11.97 (Fig. 7.16). Nitrate levels at BCK 9.40 averaged about 4.9 mg/L. Nitrate
concentrations at BCK 4.55 (NPDES Outfall 304), at the
junction of Bear Creek Road and Highway 95, averaged
1.35 mg/L, down from 2.7 mg/L in CY 1994. The average
nitrate concentration in surface water samples collected from the
farthest downstream point (BCK 0.63), which is located just
upstream of the confluence of Bear Creek and
EFPC, was 1.25 mg/L,
down from 2.5 mg/L in CY 1994 (background is about
0.2 mg/L). Average nitrate concentrations in spring discharges
decreased from an average of 25.5 mg/L at SS-1 to 4.3 mg/L at
SS-5.
Low concentrations of VOCs (\math{<}10 �g/L) were detected in
surface-water samples and spring discharge samples collected from the
upper and middle reaches of Bear Creek (at NT-1 and BCK 9.40).
Compounds detected in samples from the creek were trichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene. Spring discharges at SS-1 and
SS-4 also contained trace amounts of VOCs. Each of these compounds is a
primary component of the VOC plumes in groundwater in the regime.
Based on the 1995 data, uranium is again the most common trace metal
contaminant in Bear Creek. Concentrations of uranium exceeded background
levels throughout reaches of the creek upstream of BCK 9.40.
Moreover, uranium concentrations in the creek slightly exceeded
background levels at the farthest downstream sampling point
(BCK 0.63). Uranium concentrations in spring effluents exceed
background levels as far west as the SS-5 location.
Annual average gross alpha activity in 1994 mirrored the results of
previous years. Gross alpha was above 15 pCi/L only at
BCK 11.97 and BCK 9.40 along Bear Creek. Spring discharges
west as far as SS-5 had annual average gross alpha above 15 pCi/L.
Gross beta activity exceeded 50 pCi/L at BCK 11.97 and NT-01.
Annual average gross beta exceeded 50 pCi/L at SS-1 and SS-4.
Four categories of sites are located within the Chestnut Ridge regime:
(1) RCRA interim-status units, (2) RCRA 3004(u)
SWMUs and solid waste
disposal units, (3) TDEC-permitted solid waste disposal facilities,
and (4) CERCLA OUs. The Chestnut Ridge Security Pits is the only
documented source of groundwater contamination in the regime. No
integrating CA has been established for the regime because contamination
from the Security Pits is distinct and is not mingled with plumes from
other sources. Groundwater media will be addressed as part of the RI/FS
for each source. Table 7.4
summarizes the regulatory status and operational history of waste
management units in the regime. Detailed discussions of these sites have
been included in previous annual site environmental reports.
In late 1994, a detailed review of groundwater results from Kerr Hollow
Quarry was conducted in response to the identification of total
strontium and total uranium levels in three wells at the site that were
consistently elevated above background concentrations (GW-142, GW-145,
and GW-146; Fig. 7.18). The data review indicated that no elevated gross alpha or gross beta
was associated with the elevated metals values. Isotopic uranium and
strontium analyses also were conducted, with the results showing no
elevated activity. Hence, the elevated metals concentrations may reflect
natural geochemical variations in groundwater at the site or possibly
the impacts of waste disposal operations. In addition to the metals
evaluation, VOC occurrences were examined. The evaluation demonstrated
that low levels of tetrachloroethene and carbon tetrachloride were
sporadically observed in wells GW-142 and GW-144. The occurrences
of these compounds were first detected in 1990. The frequency of
occurrence increased during 1991 and 1992 and then began to decrease in
1993. The only detectable VOC in 1994 was carbon tetrachloride in one
sample from well GW-144 in the second calendar quarter. The
occurrences of these VOCs appears to correlate with underwater debris
removal and shredding corrective actions at the quarry, which were
conducted between August 1990 and October 1993. However, VOCs
continued to be observed during CY 1995; therefore, a trend is not
well established.
There are two distinct VOCs in groundwater at the security pits. In the
western portion of the site, the VOC plume is characterized by high
concentrations of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Tetrachloroethene is a
principal component of the VOC plume in the eastern portion of the site.
The distinct difference in the composition of the plume is probably
related to differences in the types of wastes disposed of in the eastern
and western trench areas.
A dye-tracer study was initiated and completed in 1992
(SAIC 1993
), primarily to confirm results of an initial study conducted in 1990
(Geraghty and Miller,
Inc. 1990
). The 1992 study used the same dye injection well near the Chestnut
Ridge Security Pits and many of the same monitoring points as did the
1990 study. The primary differences included an expanded monitoring
network and the use of two fluorescent dyes to verify dye detection.
Results of the second tracer-dye study showed no conclusive occurrences
of dyes at the monitoring points and did not corroborate data for
detection points in the first study. The 1992 study also showed that the
injection well was inappropriate because dye-uptake rates by the
formation were inadequate. It is likely that the dye-uptake rates are
inadequate because the source well is not screened in a flow conduit
interconnected to the rest of the system. A formal comparison report has
been completed that examines results of both studies to provide
recommendations for improvements for future dye-tracer studies in this
regime. Future dye-tracer studies are possible. The TDEC DOE Oversight
Division has conducted a small-scale tracer study east of the Sediment
Disposal Basin, although the results have not yet been published.
Monitoring of one large spring located south of Industrial Landfill V
and Construction/Demolition Landfill VII was conducted in 1994 as a
best management practice. One other spring location (SCR 2.2SP;
Fig. 7.18) was sampled in 1995, also as a best management practice in
conjunction with the TDEC DOE Oversight Division.
An investigation into contaminant transport via colloidal particles was
initiated in 1993. The study focuses on major ions and metals because
these constituent types are the most likely to adsorb onto colloids
being transported within the active flow system. The study includes
about 30 wells located within the ORR aquitards, Maynardville
Limestone, and Knox Group within the Bear Creek and Chestnut Ridge
regimes. A wide range of geologic units and depths was selected to
examine how colloidal transport of contaminants is related to these
variables. Very slow pumping rates are used to sample groundwater.
Various sizes of filters are used to filter the samples to obtain
aliquots for analysis. The various aliquots are analyzed to determine
what size range of colloidal particles adsorb and transport
contaminants. All of the subject wells have been sampled to date, and
results are being finalized. In addition, the study was amended in 1994
to include sampling of selected wells in conjunction with storm events.
The data obtained will provide insight regarding how constituents may be
mobilized in the shallow karst system as a result of high-precipitation
events. All field efforts are anticipated to be complete by
June 1996, with a final due in October 1996.
A short-term study was begun and completed in 1995 to delineate the
extent and thickness of anthropogenic fill material emplaced throughout
the Y-12 Plant during various periods of construction. These fill
zones are thought to play a major role in the movement of contaminants
and groundwater flow patterns in the water table interval beneath the
Y-12 Plant. Large volumes of topographic data, engineering data,
soil-boring logs, and monitoring-well installation logs have been
generated throughout the operational history of the Y-12 Plant.
These data were compiled, screened for completeness and accuracy, and
reduced into tabular formats denoting thickness, extent, and general
composition of anthropogenic fill material. These reduced data were used
to generate a fill isopach (thickness) map that also delineates the
known extent of anthropogenic fill for the entire Y-12 Plant
(Sutton and Field 1995
). As a follow-on study to begin in 1996, major underground utilities
will be examined to investigate their potential impacts on contaminant
distribution and shallow groundwater flow patterns in the
Y-12 Plant area. These data are important for identification of
potential exit pathways for contaminants, for determining whether
existing and planned monitoring activities are adequate, and for helping
to identify potential remediation points for source areas.
At ORNL, 20 WAGs were identified by the RCRA Facility Assessment
(RFA) conducted in 1987.
Thirteen of these have been identified as potential sources of
groundwater contamination. Additionally, there are a few areas where
potential remedial action sites are located outside the major WAGs.
These individual sites have been considered separately (instead of
expanding the area of the WAG). Water quality monitoring wells have been
established around the perimeters of the WAGs determined to have a
potential for release of contaminants. Figure 7.19 shows the location of each of the 20 WAGs.
For discussion purposes the WAGs are grouped by the valley in which they
are located; i.e., Bethel Valley WAG s include 1, 3, and 17; Melton
Valley WAGs include 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9; and WAG 11 (the White
Wing Scrapyard).
The ORNL exit pathway program is discussed in this section. The ORNL
program monitors groundwater at four general locations that are thought
to be likely exit pathways for groundwater affected by activities at
ORNL (Fig. 7.20).
Most of the WAG 1 sites were used to collect and to store
LLW in tanks, ponds, and waste
treatment facilities, but some also include landfills and contaminated
sites resulting from spills and leaks occurring over the last
50 years. Because of the nature of cleanup and repair, it is not
possible to determine which spill or leak sites still represent
potential sources of release. Most of the SWMUs are related to ORNL's
waste management operations. Recent ER activities within WAG 1 include
several CERCLA actions associated with sources of contamination; e.g.,
Surface Impoundments OU, a
treatability study associated with the Gunite and Associated Tank OU,
and two removal actions [Corehole 8 and the decontamination and
decommissioning (D&D) of
the Waste Evaporator Facility (Building 3506)].
SWSA 3 and the Closed Scrap Metal Area are inactive landfills known
to contain radioactive solid wastes and surplus materials generated at
ORNL from 1946 to 1979. Burial of solid waste ceased at this site in
1951; however, the site continued to be used as an above-ground scrap
metal storage area until 1979. Sometime during the period from 1946 to
1949, radioactive solid wastes removed from SWSA 2 were buried at
this site. In 1979, most of the scrap metal stored above ground at
SWSA 3 was either transferred to other storage areas or buried on
site in a triangular-shaped disposal area immediately south of
SWSA 3.
Records of the composition of radioactive solid waste buried in
SWSA 3 were destroyed in a fire in 1961. Sketches and drawings of
the site indicate that alpha and beta-gamma wastes were segregated and
buried in separate areas or trenches. Chemical wastes were probably also
buried in SWSA 3 because there are no records of disposal
elsewhere. Although the information is sketchy, the larger scrap metal
equipment (such as tanks and drums) stored on the surface at this site
was also probably contaminated. Because only a portion of this material
is now buried in the Closed Scrap Metal Area, it is not possible to
estimate the amount of contamination that exists in this SWMU.
The Contractors' Landfill was opened in 1975 and is now closed. It was
used to dispose of various uncontaminated construction materials. No
contaminated waste or asbestos was allowed to be buried at the site.
ORNL disposal procedures require that only non-RCRA, nonradioactive
solid wastes were to be buried in the Contractors' Landfill.
In addition to natural drainage, WOC has received treated and untreated
effluents and reactor cooling water from ORNL activities since
1943. Controlled releases include those from the
NRWTF, the sewage treatment
plant, and a variety of process waste holdup ponds throughout the ORNL
main plant area (WAG 1). It also receives groundwater discharge and
surface drainage from WAGs 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.
There is little doubt that WAG 2 represents a source of continuing
contaminant release (radionuclides and/or chemical contaminants) to the
Clinch River. Although it is known that WAG 2 receives groundwater
contamination from other WAGs, the extent to which WAG 2 may be
contributing to groundwater contamination has yet to be determined.
Recent ER activities include continued monitoring and support of the
WAG 5 seeps removal action.
SWSA 4 was opened for routine burial of solid radioactive wastes in
1951. From 1955 to 1963, Oak Ridge was designated by the Atomic Energy
Commission as the Southern Regional Burial Ground; as such, SWSA 4
received a wide variety of poorly characterized solid wastes (including
radioactive waste) from about 50 sources. These wastes consisted of
paper, clothing, equipment, filters, animal carcasses, and related
laboratory wastes. About 50% of the waste was received from sources
outside of Oak Ridge facilities. Wastes were placed in trenches, shallow
auger holes, and in piles on the ground for covering at a later date.
From 1954 to 1975, LLLW was transported from storage tanks at the main
ORNL complex to waste pits and trenches in Melton Valley (WAG 7),
and later to the hydrofracture disposal sites, through underground
transfer lines. The Pilot Pit Area (Area 7811) was constructed for
use in pilot-scale radioactive waste disposal studies from 1955 to 1959;
three large concrete cylinders containing experimental equipment remain
embedded in the ground. A removal action was initiated at WAG 4
during 1995 to grout, in place, sources of 90Sr contamination
emanating from selected trenches located within the WAG. A control
building and asphalt pad have been used for storage through the
years.
SWSA 5 South was used to dispose of solid LLW generated at ORNL from
1959 to 1973. From 1959 to 1963 the burial ground served as the
Southeastern Regional Burial Ground for the Atomic Energy Commission. At
the time SWSA 5 burial operations were initiated, about
10 acres of the site was set aside for the retrievable storage of
TRU wastes.
The WAG 5 boundary includes the Old and New Hydrofracture
Facilities. Because Melton Branch flows between the old and new
hydrofracture facilities, the new hydrofracture facility has a separate
boundary.
The WAG 5 RI field activities were completed and the RI report was
written in 1995. A CERCLA removal action was initiated in 1994 to remove
90Sr from Seeps C and D located along the southern
boundary of WAG 5.
WAG 6 was among the first to be investigated at ORNL by the ER
Program. WAG 6 is an interim-status RCRA unit because of past
disposal of RCRA-regulated hazardous waste. Environmental monitoring is
carried out under CERCLA and RCRA. A proposed CERCLA remedial action,
which involved capping WAG 6, was abandoned after a public meeting
in which members of the community objected to the high cost of
capping.
In 1995 ORNL submitted a revision to the 1988 RCRA Closure Plan which
proposed an integration of RCRA closure and CERCLA remedial action
requirements. As of this writing, ORNL has not received a response from
the TDEC.
Radioactive wastes from these facilities are collected in on-site LLLW
tanks and periodically pumped to the main plant area (WAG 1) for
storage and treatment. The waste includes demineralizer backwash,
regeneration effluents, decontamination fluids, experimental coolant,
and drainage from the compartmental areas of filter pits.
WAG 9 is located in Melton Valley about 1 km (0.6 miles)
southeast of the ORNL main plant area and adjacent to WAG 8.
WAG 9 is composed of eight SWMUs: including the Homogeneous Reactor
Experiment pond, which was used from 1958 to 1961 to hold contaminated
condensate and shield water from the reactor, and LLLW collection and
storage tanks, which were used from 1957 to 1986.
Because of the small number of groundwater monitoring wells in
WAG 8 and WAG 9, they are sampled together. The analytical
results for the two WAGs are also reported together.
Hydrofracture Experiment Site 1 is located within the boundary of
WAG 7 (south of Lagoon Road) and was the site of the first
experimental injection of grout (October 1959) as a testing program for
observing the fracture pattern created in the shale and for identifying
potential operating problems. Injected waste was water tagged with
137Cs and 141Ce. Grout consisted of diatomaceous
earth and cement.
Hydrofracture Experiment Site 2 is located about 0.8 km
(0.5 mile) south of the 7500 (experimental reactor) area
(WAG 8). The second hydrofracture experiment was designed to
duplicate, in scale, an actual disposal operation; however, radioactive
tracers were used instead of actual waste. Cement, bentonite, and water
tagged with 137Cs were used in formulating the grout.
The OHF is located about 1.6 km (1.0 mile) southwest of the
main ORNL complex near the southwest corner of WAG 5. The facility,
commissioned in 1963, disposed of liquid radioactive waste in
impermeable shale formations by hydrofracture methods, at depths of 800
to 1000 ft. Wastes used in the disposal operations included
concentrated LLLW from the Gunite tanks in WAG 2, 90Sr,
137Cs, 244Cm, TRU, and other, unidentified
radionuclides.
The New Hydrofracture Facility is located 900 ft southwest of the
OHF on the south side of Melton Branch. The facility was constructed to
replace the OHF. Wastes used in the injections were concentrated LLLW
and sludge removed from the Gunite tanks, 90Sr,
137Cs, 244Cm, TRU, and other nuclides. Plans to
plug and abandon several deep injection wells at WAG 10 were made
in 1995.
The White Wing Scrap Yard was used for aboveground storage of
contaminated material from ORNL, the K-25 Site, and the
Y-12 Plant. The material stored at the site by ORNL consisted
largely of contaminated steel tanks; trucks; earth-moving equipment;
assorted large pieces of steel, stainless steel, and aluminum; and
reactor cell vessels removed during cleanup of Building 3019. An
interim record of decision was agreed to by the TDEC,
EPA, and DOE requiring surface
debris to be removed from the site. This work was completed in 1994.
The area began receiving material (primarily metal, glass, concrete, and
trash with alpha, beta, and gamma contamination) in the early 1950s.
Information regarding possible hazardous waste contamination has not
been found. The precise dates of material storage are uncertain, as is
the time when the area was closed to further storage. In 1966, efforts
were begun to clean up the area by disposing of contaminated materials
in ORNL's SWSA 5 and by the sale of uncontaminated material
to an outside contractor for scrap. Cleanup continued at least into
1970, and removal of contaminated soil began in the same year. Some
scrap metal, concrete, and other trash are still located in the area.
Numerous radioactive areas, steel drums, and
PCB-contaminated soil were
identified during surface radiological investigations conducted during
1989 and 1990 at WAG 11. The amount of material or contaminated
soil remaining in the area is not known.
A summary of the groundwater surveillance program is presented in
Table 7.6.
RCRA assessment data for WAG 6 were submitted to TDEC in March
1995. As part of the WAG 6 RCRA/CERCLA integrated monitoring
approach, RCRA assessment groundwater monitoring continued during 1995
under the auspices of the Environmental Monitoring Plan
(EMP) for WAG 6 at ORNL,
a CERCLA driver monitoring plan, agreed to in principle by DOE, EPA ,
and TDEC in June 1994. Baseline groundwater monitoring under the EMP was
initiated in October 1994 and ended in September 1995. All 24 RCRA
groundwater monitoring wells were sampled with the following recency:
eight quarterly and 16 semiannually. Routine groundwater monitoring
conducted under the EMP was initiated in October 1995. A subset of 12
RCRA groundwater monitoring wells will be sampled on a semi-annual basis
under the routine monitoring scenario. The 12 downgradient wells
involved in routine monitoring are 835, 837, 841, 842, 843, 844, 4315,
4316, and 4317. The remaining wells are located upgradient of the
hazardous waste disposal area. These wells include 846, 857, and 858.
Under baseline and routine monitoring selected
VOCs and radionuclides will be
sampled for. The remaining WAGs are currently monitored to comply with
DOE orders 5400.1 and 5400.5, which do not specify sampling schedules.
ORNL samples groundwater quality wells at the remaining WAGs on a
rotational basis.
The plant perimeter surveillance program, as stipulated in the EMP, was
initiated in 1993. A summary of the program is presented in Table 7.7.
Eighteen of the 20 wells identified by the EMP represent ORNL's
exit pathway and are also part of the WAG perimeter monitoring program
(WAG s 2, 3, 6, 11, and 17). As such, 1995 result data from
sampling conducted under the WAG perimeter program are used for the
monitoring plan program. The other two wells (of the 20) were not
sampled in 1995 because a decision is pending regarding installation of
dedicated pumps in them. The four surface water locations (Bear Creek,
Raccoon Creek, Bearden Creek, and WOC at
WOD) were sampled in September
1995. The results of the plant perimeter monitoring program are
discussed as part of the OU discussions.
Groundwater quality is regulated under RCRA by referring to the
SDWA standards. The standards
are applied when a site undergoes RCRA permitting. None of the ORNL WAGs
are under RCRA permits at this time; therefore, no permit standards
exist with which to compare sampling results. In an effort to provide a
basis for evaluation of analytical results and for assessment of
groundwater quality at ORNL WAGs, federal
DWSs and Tennessee water
quality criteria for domestic water supplies are used as reference
values in the following discussions. When no federal or state standard
has been established for a radionuclide, then 4% of the DOE
DCG has been used. Although
DWSs are used, it is unrealistic to assume that members of the public
are going to drink groundwater from ORNL WAGs. There are no groundwater
wells furnishing drinking water to personnel at ORNL.
The gross beta activity at the wells of concern is attributable mainly
to total radioactive strontium and its daughters. Gross alpha activity
at WAG 1 ranged from below detection to 4.3 pCi/L; beta
activity ranged from below detection to 270 pCi/L (the DWS is
50 pCi/L); and total radioactive strontium ranged from below
detection to 140 pCi/L (the DWS is 8 pCi/L). All of these much
lower than values which have been observed in the past; however, two of
the wells which have traditionally had high levels of radioactivity were
not sampled this year.
VOCs were detected in some of the wells; however, most of these were
also detected in the laboratory blanks. One well had vinyl chloride
detected above DWSs and this well has had similar vinyl chloride
concentrations in the past.
Fluoride at one well was detected above DWSs; this is the third time
fluoride has exceeded the DWS. No well values for metals exceeded
DWSs.
Strontium has been detected historically in wells along the entire
northern perimeter of the site. Values exceeding the primary DWS for
total radioactive strontium and gross beta activity have consistently
been observed at four wells in every sampling event. The gross beta
signatures are mainly attributable to total radioactive strontium. The
data for the wells along the eastern and northeastern boundaries show
evidence of radioactive contamination, including 3H and gross
alpha activity. The data for the northwest boundary show the presence of
3H.
Gross alpha activity at WAG 3 ranged from not being detected to
12 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta activity ranged from not
being detected to 1500 pCi/L (the DWS is 50 pCi/L); and total
radioactive strontium ranged from not being detected to 970 pCi/L
(the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged from not being detected to
19,000 pCi/L (the DWS is 20,000 pCi/L).
In a few of the downgradient wells, VOCs were detected. Trichloroethene
has consistently been detected above DWSs in every sampling event at one
well located in the northeast part of the WAG.
The data for the wells along the southeastern and southwestern
boundaries show evidence of VOCs. The contamination has consistently
been located primarily in one well. The pollutants include
trichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, vinyl chloride, tetrachloroethene,
1,1-dichloroethene, and benzene.
For example, four of the WAG 2 wells that exhibited high levels of
3H are located south of and downgradient of WAGs 5, 6,
and 8. All of the WAG 2 wells show evidence of
radioactivity, including gross alpha and gross beta activity and
3H. Gross beta activity above primary DWSs was detected at
one well on the west side of WAG 7 and at one well south of WAG
6. The elevated levels of 3H and total radioactive
strontium in the perimeter wells at WOD are believed to be the result of
surface-water underflow at the dam, not groundwater contamination. Gross
alpha activity at WAG 2 ranged from not being detected to
12 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta activity ranged from not
being detected to 780 pCi/L (the DWS is 50 pCi/L); and total
radioactive strontium ranged from not being detected to 320 pCi/L
(the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged from not being detected to
350,000 pCi/L (the DWS is 20,000 pCi/L).
Chromium and nickel were detected above DWS at a well south of
WAG 6. The nickel result was only slightly above DWS and has not
been above a standard since 1992. Chromium has been above DWS the past 3
sampling events, and this year it is two and one half times the
historical maximum.
VOCs continue to be detected in wells on the eastern boundary. Two wells
have consistently had VOC concentrations above DWSs.
Total radioactive strontium appears to be the major beta emitter found
in WAG 5 groundwater. It is found mainly in one well on the
southern perimeter. Alpha activity above DWSs has historically been
consistently observed in one well on the northwestern boundary of the
WAG. This well was pumped dry in 1994 and in 1995 it was sampled and
gross alpha was slightly less than DWS.
Gross alpha activity at WAG 5 ranged from not being detected to
14 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta activity ranged from not
being detected to 1800 pCi/L (the DWS is 50 pCi/L); and total
radioactive strontium ranged from not being detected to 840 pCi/L
(the DWS is 8 pCi/L).
VOCs were detected in the wells along the southern and western
boundaries, including vinyl chloride, 1,2-dichloroethene, acetone,
carbon disulfide, benzene, and trichloroethene. Several wells have
consistently exceeded DWSs for these contaminants.
No upgradient wells exceeded DWSs for radioactivity or volatile
organics.
Elevated levels of 3H are found in wells along the eastern
perimeter. Gross alpha activity at WAG 6 ranged from not being
detected to 21 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); and total
radioactive strontium ranged from not being detected to 54 pCi/L
(the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged from not being detected to
3.5 � 106 pCi/L (the DWS is
20,000 pCi/L).
Gross alpha activity was detected at one well in excess of primary DWSs.
Isotopic identification shows this activity to be attributed to
241Am, 238Pu, 239Pu, 228Th,
230Th, 234U, 235U, and 238U.
Gross alpha activity ranged from not being detected to
210 pCi/L.
Gross beta activity was detected at levels in excess of primary DWSs at
four wells, and 3H was detected at each of these wells, also
above DWSs. Gross beta activity ranged from not being detected to
6200 pCi/L; total radioactive strontium ranged from not being
detected to 4.6 pCi/L; and 3H ranged from not being
detected to 380,000 pCi/L.
Three wells have consistently had nitrate detected at levels that exceed
primary DWSs. One well had fluoride above DWS, consistent with
historical values. Minimal VOC contamination has been detected in the
WAG 7 wells.
All of the perimeter wells show evidence of radioactivity. The data
indicate that the gross beta activity is attributable to total
radioactive strontium. The two wells on the northwestern perimeter
exceeded DWSs: one well with respect to 3H contamination and
the other with respect to gross beta activity and total radioactive
strontium contamination. Gross alpha activity ranged from not being
detected to 4.6 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta activity
ranged from not being detected to 3800 pCi/L (the DWS is
50 pCi/L); and total radioactive strontium ranged from not being
detected to 1300 pCi/L (the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged
from not being detected to 59,000 pCi/L (the DWS is
20,000 pCi/L). Total radioactive strontium and gross beta activity
levels exceeded the DWSs at the two WAG 9 wells.
VOCs were detected at downgradient wells, all below DWSs. One well has
historically shown trichloroethene above DWSs; this year it did not.
None of the data for the upgradient wells show evidence of VOCs.
Two wells had trichloroethene detected above DWSs, which is consistent
with historical data for these two wells. No other VOCs were detected in
those wells.
Splitting and abandoning the well casing in place also minimizes the
generation of waste that would be created if other methods were used.
Special tools were developed to split the casings of different sizes and
material. A down-hole camera was used during development of the
splitting tools to evaluate their effectiveness.
Detailed procedures have been developed and documented regarding the use
of specific grout materials in different well environments. These
procedures were tested and evaluated during the 1993 plugging and
abandonment activities.
The K-25 Site Groundwater Program is a component in the
ORR
ER strategy described in the
ORR Site Management Plan for the ER Program
(DOE 1995
). The cleanup strategy described in the site management plan has been
developed to accelerate the transition of areas of concern from
characterization to remediation by making decisions at the watershed
scale based on recommended land use. The watershed is a surface drainage
basin that includes an area of concern or group of areas of concern to
be investigated and/or remediated. This approach allows for systematic
monitoring and evaluation of contaminant sources and migration through
the use of integrated surface water and groundwater monitoring.
Only one watershed has been designated at the K-25 Site. In this
report, WAG boundaries defined
to correspond with perceived hydrogeologic boundaries are used for
reporting the results of groundwater monitoring. The WAG designations
and associated areas of concern are described in the following
section.
Unlike the other ORR facilities, where many source areas are located in
relatively undeveloped areas of the reservation, most of the source
areas at the K-25 Site are located within the highly industrialized
areas of the site. The surface topography has been altered considerably
as a result of site construction. Large areas have been excavated or
filled to yield the present low-relief landscape. As much as 60 ft
(18.3 m) of materials have been excavated locally, and equal
amounts of fill have been placed in adjacent low areas. Where they
extend below the water table, the filled areas may represent primary
pathways for contaminant migration. A number of sinkholes identified in
historical photographs are not visible on the surface today. Many have
been filled during construction, and buildings (such as K-33) have been
erected directly above them.
The storm drain network discharges to Mitchell Branch, the K-1007-P1
pond, the K-901A Holding Pond, or directly to Poplar Creek and the
Clinch River. Storm drain video surveys show water flowing both in and
out of the storm drain system, suggesting that the storm drains may
serve as groundwater sinks or as sources. In addition, at least ten
buildings have basements with sumps below the seasonal low water table.
Water that accumulates in the sumps is discharged to the sanitary sewer
or CNF system, storm drains,
or, in rare occasions, to the ground. All of these systems have been
active since the construction in the 1940s.
Bedrock underlying the K-25 Site can be broadly categorized as
carbonate (Knox and Chickamauga groups) or clastic (Rome formation and
possibly the Conasauga group). The carbonates underlie most of the main
plant area, including the K-27/29 Peninsula K-1070-A Burial Ground, the
K-25 Building, and the K-1004 laboratory area. The eastern
portion of the site, including the K-1070-C/D Burial Ground and much of
the Mitchell Branch area, is underlain by clastics of the Rome formation
and possibly the Conasauga group. The structural geology of the
K-25 Site is perhaps the most complicated on the ORR. It includes
``map-scale'' folds and faults and ``outcrop-scale'' fractures, folds,
and faults. Complex faulting, fracturing, and folding in the clastic
bedrock precludes definition of simple bedding geometry. Therefore,
groundwater flow paths cannot be predicted in this area of the site.
Cavities have been encountered in 39% of all subsurface
penetrations at the K-25 Site. Cavity heights are typically greater
in the Knox group carbonates. Recent drilling activities in the vicinity
of the K-1070-A Burial Ground have encountered cavernous bedrock with
cavities up to 22 ft (6.7 m) in height; however, based on
camera and sonar surveys, the lateral extent of these cavities appears
limited. Although large cavities have been reported in some locations in
the Chickamauga bedrock, typical cavity heights are generally less than
5 ft (1.5 m).
Groundwater occurs in both the unconsolidated zone and bedrock,
primarily as a single water table aquifer. Perched water may be of local
significance. With few exceptions, the water table occurs in the
overburden above bedrock across the site, with saturated overburden
thickness ranging up to 70 ft (21.4 m). Because bedrock is
exposed along the bottom of the Clinch River and Poplar Creek, the
unconsolidated-zone flow paths are truncated at these boundaries.
Surveys indicate that groundwater flows radially from higher elevations
toward the bounding surface water features; however, the sumps and
drains that lie below the seasonal low water table affect the
configuration of the water table surface and thus affect the contaminant
flow paths.
Groundwater flow in the unconsolidated zones is expected to be in the
direction of the mapped hydraulic gradients. In the carbonate bedrock,
groundwater flow is expected to be controlled by hydraulic gradients and
geologic strike. In the Rome Formation groundwater flow directions
cannot be predicted with any certainty. Recent studies have shown that
hydraulic gradients are steepest (and consequently, overall flux is
greatest) during the wet season and low pool stage periods. Much of the
site is paved or otherwise covered, reducing direct recharge by
groundwater; however, leaking underground utilities and storm drains are
likely to recharge the groundwater substantially.
No perennial springs have been identified along Poplar Creek or the
Clinch River. Wet-season springs located along the exposed low pool
stage shores of Poplar Creek and the Clinch River do not appear
consistently from year to year. It is unlikely that the karst features
were active before the impoundment of the Clinch River. It is believed
that since that time, however, the dramatic increase in base-level heads
has resulted in a ``backed-up'' karst flow system. Consequently, the
presence of karst features at the K-25 Site does not seem to
indicate conduit-dominated groundwater flow.
No wells were plugged or abandoned during 1995 at the K-25 Site. A
detailed evaluation of existing wells to identify candidates for
plugging and abandonment will likely be conducted at some time in the
future. Wells no longer required for monitoring or wells whose
construction or annular seal integrity are in doubt will be designated
at that time for plugging and abandonment.
Metals in groundwater that exceeded either a primary or secondary DWS
include aluminum, chromium, iron, manganese, nickel, and thallium. The
DWS for chromium was exceeded at one well during one sampling event.
Nickel exceeded the DWS at three wells with a maximum reported
concentration of 0.626 mg/L. Thallium exceeded the DWS at two wells
during 1995 with a maximum concentration of 0.005 mg/L.
Gross alpha activity was not detected in any of the 15 monitoring
wells during 1995. Gross beta activity did not exceed the reference
level of 50 pCi/L.
The DWS for gross alpha was exceeded in one bedrock well and three
unconsolidated-zone wells. Gross alpha activity ranged from 22.2 to
43.2 pCi/L (limits of error ranged from 5.1 to 8.7 pCi/L).
Uranium appears to be the primary alpha-emitting isotope present in
groundwater in these four wells. Two of the wells are located along
Mitchell Branch, one is near the K-1420 Building, and the fourth in the
Blair Road Quarry.
Gross beta exceeded the reference value at seven wells within the north
main plant area. Activity ranged from 86.1 to 528 pCi/L (limits of
error ranged from 7.3 to 35 pCi/L). The wells are located in the
vicinity of the former K-1407-B and C ponds and the K-1070-C/D
classified burial ground.
Metals detected at concentrations above a primary DWS included
antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, nickel, and thallium. The DWSs for
antimony, arsenic, cadmium, and nickel were each exceeded in one well.
The DWS for barium was exceeded in two wells. The DWS for thallium was
exceeded in six wells; however, this occurred only during the spring
sampling event. The DWS for thallium was exceeded at one well during
the fall sampling event. The secondary DWSs for aluminum, iron, and
manganese were exceeded in numerous wells in this area. In addition,
DWSs for chloride, nitrate, and sulfate were exceeded at one well
each.
Semivolatile organic chemicals are present in some of the wells in the
vicinity of the K-1414 garage. This area is the only location within the
K-25 Site where semivolatile organic chemicals that are not common
laboratory contaminants have been consistently detected in groundwater
samples.
Gross alpha activity at levels exceeding the DWS was reported for four
bedrock wells. The gross alpha activities ranged from 15.4 to
32.1 pCi/L (limits of error ranged from 5.3 to 8.2 pCi/L).
Based on the limit of error, two of the four wells may not exceed the
DWS of 15 pCi/L. Gross beta activity exceeding the reference level
of 50 pCi/L was reported for one bedrock well during one sampling
event. Gross beta activity was 60.1 pCi/L (limit of error of
6.3 pCi/L) in well BRW-3 during the spring of 1995.
The primary DWSs for arsenic and lead were exceeded at one well each,
but this exceedence occurred during only one of the two sampling events.
Aluminum, iron, and manganese exceeded secondary DWSs at four wells.
Fluoride and sulfate also exceeded DWSs at one well.
Reported metals concentrations exceeding DWSs included aluminum,
chromium, iron, manganese, nickel, and thallium. The primary DWS for
chromium was exceeded at two bedrock wells, for nickel at one bedrock
well and three unconsolidated-zone wells, and for thallium at one
unconsolidated zone well.
Gross alpha activity and gross beta activity were detected in some
monitoring wells; however, none of the reported activities exceeded a
DWS.
Chromium concentrations in excess of the primary DWS were reported for
three unconsolidated-zone wells. Chromium concentrations ranged from
0.112 to 0.741 mg/L. The DWS for nickel was exceeded at one
unconsolidated-zone well and for thallium at four unconsolidated-zone
wells and one bedrock well. Aluminum, iron, and manganese exceeded
secondary DWSs at several wells. Fluoride exceeded its DWS at one
well.
Gross beta activity was detected at many of the wells in this area;
however, neither the gross beta activities nor the gross alpha
activities reported for any of the wells exceeded its DWS.
Nine VOCs were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective
DWSs: 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene,
benzene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride,
tetrachloroethene, and trichloroethene. Trichloroethene is the
predominant VOC; the DWS was exceeded in 20 monitoring wells.
Reported concentrations of trichloroethene ranged from 7 to
3600 �g/L in both unconsolidated-zone wells and bedrock wells. Two
VOCs, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethene, were detected at
concentrations in excess of 1000 �g/L. Benzene, chloroform, and
methylene chloride were detected above their DWSs in one well apiece.
Generally, the wells in the K-901 area that exhibited contamination from
VOCs are located near the K-1070-A burial ground.
Gross beta activity exceeded the reference value of 50 pCi/L in
nine wells (six bedrock wells and three unconsolidated zone wells). The
reported gross beta activities ranged from 59 pCi/L (limit of error
of 5.6 pCi/L) to 6,770 pCi/L (limit of error of
340 pCi/L). Gross alpha activity exceeded the DWS at one bedrock
well with a reported activity of 19.2 pCi/L (limit of error of
4.2 pCi/L).
Nickel, lead, and thallium were the only metals exceeding a primary DWS
in this area. Nickel and thallium exceeded the DWS at one well each.
Lead exceeded the DWS at two wells. Aluminum, iron, and manganese
exceeded their respective secondary DWSs at several wells.
Aluminum, iron, and manganese are the metals that exceeded a DWS. Low
concentrations of several VOCs and semivolatile organic compounds were
detected; however, only trichloroethene exceeded a DWS. A concentration
of 16 �g/L of trichloroethene was reported for one well during the
fall sampling event.
Beta activity was detected in most of the wells. The maximum reported
activity of 20.2 pCi/L is well below the reference value of
50 pCi/L. Gross alpha activity was not detected at any wells.
The DWS for nickel was exceeded in one well; the concentration was
reported as 0.154 mg/L. The DWS for thallium was exceeded in four
wells; concentrations ranged from 0.007 to 0.021 mg/L. Secondary
DWSs were exceeded for sulfate, aluminum, iron, and manganese in several
wells.
Low concentrations of several VOCs were reported for some wells;
however, no VOCs were detected at concentrations above a DWS.
Aluminum, iron, and manganese exceeded DWSs at most of the spring
locations. No other metals exceeded a DWS at any of the springs. Two
VOCs, tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene, were detected at
concentrations exceeding DWSs at one spring within the plant site. This
spring is located downgradient of the K-1070-C/D classified burial
ground.
Gross alpha activity exceeded the DWS of 15 pCi/L at one monitoring
well location; however, taking into account the limit of error, this
result may or may not be above the DWS. The reported activity was
17 pCi/L (limit of error of 7.1 pCi/L). This well is located
near the K-1007-P1 pond in the southern portion of the K-25 Site.
This exceedence was reported for the spring sampling event but was not
repeated during the fall sampling event. None of the gross beta activity
results for the exit-pathway wells exceeded the reference level of
50 pCi/L.
7.2.5 Y-12 Plant Groundwater Quality
7.2.5.1 Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Hydrogeologic
Regime
The East Fork regime encompasses the Y-12 Plant complex, extending
west from Scarboro Road. It is separated from the Bear Creek regime by a
topographic and hydrologic boundary located near the west end of the
plant. The 1995 monitoring locations, waste management sites, and
petroleum fuel USTs in the East Fork regime that are addressed in this
document are shown in Fig. 7.7. Regulatory status of waste management sites in the East Fork Regime is
summarized on Fig. 7.4. Brief descriptions of the waste management sites are presented in
Table 7.2.
Detailed operational histories of these sites have been published in
previous ORR annual site environmental reports.Discussion of Monitoring Results
The objectives of the 1995 groundwater monitoring program in the East
Fork regime were (1) to further define contaminant plume boundaries
and (2) to evaluate potential contaminant exit pathways by using
the existing monitoring well network in the Maynardville Limestone.
Locations of monitoring stations are shown in Fig. 7.7.Plume Delineation
The primary groundwater contaminants in the East Fork regime are
nitrate, VOCs, trace metals, and radionuclides. Sources of nitrate,
trace metals, and radionuclides are the S-2 Site, the Abandoned
Nitric Acid Pipeline, and the S-3 Site. Although it is located west
of the hydrologic divide that separates the East Fork regime from the
Bear Creek regime, the S-3 Site has contributed to groundwater
contamination in the western part of the regime. A mound in the water
table created by disposal of large volumes of liquid wastes during
operation of the S-3 Site (formerly the S-3 Ponds) allowed
contaminants to move into areas east of the current hydrologic divide.
Sources of VOCs in the East Fork regime include the S-3 Site,
several sites located within the Y-12 Salvage Yard, the Waste Coolant
Processing Area, petroleum USTs, and process/production buildings in the
plant.Nitrate
Nitrate concentrations exceeded the 10 mg/L maximum contamination
level during 1994 in a large part of the western portion of the East
Fork regime (Fig. 7.8). (A complete list of DWSs is
presented in Appendix D.) Groundwater containing nitrate
concentrations as high as 10,000 mg/L occurs in the unconsolidated
zone and at shallow bedrock depths just east of the S-3 Site. In
1994, the highest observed annual average nitrate value was in well
GW-251, about 2000 ft (610 m) southeast of the S-3 Site
(Fig. 7.8).Trace Metals
Concentrations of barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead exceeded maximum
contamination levels during 1994 in samples collected from monitoring
wells at the S-2 Site, the Y-12 Salvage Yard, the Waste
Coolant Processing Area, the 9754 and 9754-2 Fuel facilities, Rust
Garage, two exit-pathway wells, and New Hope Pond. Elevated
concentrations of these metals were most commonly reported for
groundwater samples collected from wells monitoring the unconsolidated
zone. Groundwater at shallow bedrock depths contained elevated metals
concentrations near the Y-12 Salvage Yard, the S-2 Site, and
at New Hope Pond. A definable plume of elevated metals contaminants is
not present; metals above maximum contaminant levels tend to occur
adjacent to the source units. A rigorous statistical evaluation was
conducted as part of the RCRA postclosure permit application for the
East Fork regime to determine whether New Hope Pond was a source of
metals contamination. The analysis showed that New Hope Pond was not a
statistically discernable source of metals, gross alpha activity, or
gross beta activity.Volatile Organic Compounds
Because of the many source areas, VOCs are the most widespread
groundwater contaminants in the East Fork regime. Dissolved VOCs in the
regime generally consist of two types of compounds: chlorinated solvents
and petroleum hydrocarbons. The highest concentrations of dissolved
chlorinated solvents (about 12 mg/L) are found at the Waste Coolant
Processing Area and Y-12 Salvage Yard. The highest dissolved
concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (about 60 mg/L) occur in
groundwater near the Rust Garage Area.Radionuclides
As in the Bear Creek regime, the primary alpha-emitting radionuclides
found in the East Fork regime are isotopes of uranium, radium,
neptunium, and americium. The primary beta-emitting radionuclide is
technetium.Exit-Pathway and Perimeter
Monitoring
Exit-pathway groundwater monitoring activities in the East Fork regime
in 1995 involved ongoing monitoring and trending of data from
exit-pathway wells installed in 1992. The 1992 ORR environmental report
contained a detailed discussion of the new exit-pathway monitoring
network. Surface water quality in UEFPC is regularly monitored in
accordance with NPDES
permits, and the results are summarized in Sect. 4 .7.2.5.2 Union Valley Focus Study
Upon confirmation by the exit-pathway and perimeter monitoring programs
that VOCs were migrating off of the ORR , the Y-12 Plant ER
Program was assigned as the lead organization for future actions using
CERCLA criteria. Immediate notifications were made to appropriate local,
state, and EPA agencies through the DOE occurrence reporting
process. A public meeting was held in March 1994 to present the
data obtained to date, address any concerns by stakeholders, and
describe both short-term and long-term actions that would be taken to
investigate the problem, determine if any risk to public health and the
environment existed, and develop interim corrective measures, if
required.7.2.5.3 Bear Creek Hydrogeologic Regime
Located west of the Y-12 Plant in BCV, the Bear Creek regime is
bounded to the north by Pine Ridge and to the south by Chestnut Ridge.
The regime encompasses the portion of BCV extending from the west end of
the Y-12 Plant to Highway 95. Figures 7.15 and 7.16 show the Bear Creek regime, locations of stations sampled in 1995, and
the locations of its waste management sites. The BCV CA lies within the
regime and includes all source units, groundwater, surface water, and
soils/sediments, with the exception of the SY-200 Yard and Spoil
Area I, which are separate actions (Fig. 7.4; Table 7.3).
Discussion of Monitoring Results
Groundwater-monitoring efforts in the Bear Creek regime during 1995 were
(1) to maintain surveillance of contaminant plumes (both extent and
concentration of contaminants); (2) to conduct trending at
potential contaminant exit pathways in the Maynardville Limestone using
existing monitoring locations; and (3) to conduct corrective action
monitoring at point-of-compliance sites, exit pathways, and background
wells in accordance with the Bear Creek regime RCRA postclosure
permit.Plume Delineation
The primary groundwater contaminants in the Bear Creek regime are
nitrate, trace metals, VOCs, and radionuclides. The S-3 Site is the
primary source of nitrate, radionuclides, and trace metals. Sources of
VOCs include the S-3 Site, the Rust Spoil Area, Oil Landfarm waste
management area, and the Bear Creek Burial Grounds waste management
area; the latter two sites are the principal sources. Dense nonaqueous
phase liquids (DNAPLs) exist
at a depth of 270 ft below the Bear Creek Burial Grounds. The
DNAPLs consist primarily of tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene,
1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, and high concentrations of
PCBs.Nitrate
Unlike most of the other groundwater contaminants, nitrate moves easily
with the groundwater. The limits of the nitrate plume probably define
the maximum extent of subsurface contamination in the Bear Creek
regime.Trace Metals
Barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury have been identified from
previous monitoring as the principal trace metal contaminants in
groundwater in the Bear Creek regime. Historically, the concentrations
of these metals exceeded maximum contamination levels or natural
(background) levels primarily in low-pH groundwater at shallow depths
near the S-3 Site. Disposal of acidic liquid wastes at this site reduced
the pH of the groundwater, which allows the metals to remain in
solution. Elsewhere in the Bear Creek regime, where relatively high pH
conditions prevail, only sporadic occurrences of elevated trace metal
concentrations are evident.Volatile Organic Compounds
Like nitrate, VOCs are widespread in groundwater in the Bear Creek
regime (Fig. 7.12). The primary compounds are tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and 1,1-dichloroethane. In
most areas, the VOCs are dissolved in the groundwater, but nonaqueous
phase accumulations of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene occur in
bedrock more than 250 ft below the Bear Creek Burial Grounds waste
management area.Radionuclides
Uranium, neptunium, americium, and naturally occurring isotopes of
radium have been identified as the primary alpha-particle emitting
radionuclides in the Bear Creek regime. Technetium is the primary
beta-particle emitting radionuclide in the regime, but tritium and
isotopes of strontium also may be present in groundwater near the
S-3 Site.Exit-Pathway and Perimeter
Monitoring
Exit-pathway monitoring began in 1990 to provide data on the quality of
groundwater and surface water exiting the Bear Creek regime. The
Maynardville Limestone is the primary exit pathway for groundwater. Bear
Creek, which flows across the Maynardville Limestone in much of the Bear
Creek regime, is the principal exit pathway for surface water. Various
studies have shown that surface water in Bear Creek and groundwater in
the Maynardville Limestone are hydraulically connected. The western
exit-pathway well transect (Picket W) serves as the ORR perimeter
wells for the Bear Creek Regime (Fig. 7.6).7.2.5.4 Chestnut Ridge Hydrogeologic Regime
The Chestnut Ridge regime is south of the Y-12 Plant and is flanked
to the north by BCV and to the south by Bethel Valley Road (Fig. 7.5). The regime encompasses the portion of Chestnut Ridge extending from
Scarboro Road east of the Y-12 Plant to an unnamed drainage basin
on the ridge located just west of Centralized Sanitary Landfill II.
Figure 7.18 shows the approximate boundaries of the regime and locations of waste
management units and monitoring wells sampled in 1995.Discussion of Monitoring Results
Groundwater quality data obtained in the Chestnut Ridge regime during
1995 support conclusions drawn from previous monitoring results. A more
comprehensive suite of analytical tests is applied to most sites in the
Chestnut Ridge regime because of various permitting requirements;
however, volatile organics and trace metals are the only categories in
which findings currently consistently exceed background levels. Gross
alpha and beta activities have sporadically exceeded screening levels in
the past in samples taken from wells at the Chestnut Ridge Sediment
Disposal Basin, United Nuclear Site, Industrial Landfill III, and
Kerr Hollow Quarry. No discernable pattern or consistency to the data
has been determined.Plume Delineation
The horizontal extent of the VOC plume at the Chestnut Ridge Security
Pits is reasonably well defined in the water table and shallow bedrock
zones (Fig. 7.12). Groundwater quality data obtained during 1995 continues to indicate
that the lateral extent of the VOC plume at the site is increasing
slightly, as evidenced by detectable signature VOCs
(1,1,1-trichloroethane) in Wells GW-608, GW-609, GW-514, GW-305, GW-796,
and GW-175.Nitrate
Nitrate concentrations were well below the DWS of 10 mg/L in all
wells.Trace Metals
Chromium concentrations in unfiltered samples sporadically exceeded DWSs
in four wells. Cadmium levels exceeded DWSs in single samples collected
from two wells. Lead levels exceed DWSs in single samples collected from
three wells.Volatile Organic Compounds
Efforts to delineate the extent of VOCs in groundwater at the security
pits (previously discussed) have been in progress since 1987. A review
of historical data suggests that VOC concentrations in groundwater at
the site have generally decreased since 1988 (Table 7.5).
Low levels of VOCs were observed at a few additional scattered
locations in 1995. Of particular note, trace levels of carbon
tetrachloride were observed in two samples from Kerr Hollow Quarry (Well
GW-144) and perchloroethene was observed in one sample.Radionuclides
Annual average gross alpha exceeded 15 pCi/L in three wells
(GW-160, GW-562, and GW-732; Fig. 7.13). Gross beta activities were below the DWS of 50 pCi/L at all
locations.Exit-Pathway and Perimeter
Monitoring
Exit-pathway monitoring in the Chestnut Ridge regime has followed a
different approach from that used for the other two regimes. Contaminant
and groundwater flow paths in the karst bedrock underlying the regime
are not best identified through conventional monitoring techniques. The
comprehensive groundwater monitoring plan, therefore, presented a
rationale for using dye-tracer studies to identify exit pathways. Based
on the results of dye-tracer studies, springs and surface streams that
represent discharge points for groundwater can be identified for water
quality monitoring.7.2.5.5 Special Studies
Two special studies involving groundwater at the Y-12 Plant were
conducted in CY 1995. These investigations included: (1) a
continuation of an evaluation of contaminant transport via colloidal
particles in groundwater; and (2) study of the controlling
influence of man-made (anthropogenic) fill and major utilities on
groundwater movement within the Y-12 Plant.7.3 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT THE OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
7.3.1 Background
The groundwater monitoring program at
ORNL consists of a network of
wells of two basic types and functions: (1) water quality
monitoring wells built to
RCRA specifications and used
for site characterization and compliance purposes and
(2) piezometer wells used to characterize groundwater flow
conditions. The ER Program
provides comprehensive cleanup of sites where past and current research,
development, and waste management activities may have resulted in
residual contamination of the environment. Individual monitoring and
assessment is assumed to be impractical for each of these sites because
their boundaries are indistinct and because there are hydrologic
interconnections between many of them. Consequently, the concept of
WAGs was developed to
facilitate evaluation of potential sources of releases to the
environment. A WAG is a grouping of multiple sites that are
geographically contiguous and/or that occur within hydrologically
(geohydrologic) defined areas. WAGs allow establishment of suitably
comprehensive groundwater and surface water monitoring and remediation
programs in a far shorter time than that required to deal with every
facility, site, or SWMU
individually. Some WAGs share boundaries, but each WAG represents a
collection of distinct small drainage areas, within which similar
contaminants may have been introduced. Monitoring data from each WAG are
used to direct further groundwater studies aimed at addressing
individual sites or units within a WAG as well as contaminant
plumes that extend beyond the perimeter of a WAG.7.3.2 Bethel Valley
7.3.2.1 WAG 1
WAG 1, the ORNL main plant area, contains about one-half of the
remedial action sites identified to date by the ER Program. WAG 1 lies
within the Bethel Valley portion of the
WOC drainage basin. The
boundaries of the basin extend to the southeast and northeast along
Chestnut Ridge and Haw Ridge. The WAG boundary extends to the water gap
in Haw Ridge. The total area of the basin in Bethel Valley is about
2040 acres. Bedrock beneath the main plant area is limestone,
siltstone, and calcareous shale facies of the Ordovician Chickamauga
Group.7.3.2.2 WAG 3
WAG 3 is located in Bethel Valley about 1 km (0.6 mile)
west of the main plant area. WAG 3 is composed of three SWMUs:
SWSA 3, the Closed Scrap
Metal Area (1562), and the Contractors Landfill (1554).7.3.2.3 WAG 17
WAG 17 is located about 1.6 km (1 mile) directly east of
the ORNL main plant area. This area has served as the major craft and
machine shop area for ORNL since the late 1940s. The area includes the
receiving and shipping departments, machine shops, carpenter shops,
paint shops, lead-burning facilities, garage facilities, welding
facilities, and material storage areas that are needed to support ORNL's
routine and experimental operations. It is composed of 17 SWMUs. A
former septic tank now used as a sewage collection/pumping station for
the area, and seven tanks used for waste oil collection and storage and
for storage of photographic reproduction wastes.7.3.3 Melton Valley
7.3.3.1 WAG 2
WAG 2 is composed of White Oak Creek discharge points and includes
the associated floodplain and subsurface environment. It represents the
major drainage system for ORNL and the surrounding facilities. 7.3.3.2 WAG 4
WAG 4 is located in Melton Valley about 0.8 km (0.5 mile)
southwest of the main ORNL plant site. It comprises the SWSA 4
waste disposal area, liquid low-level (radioactive) waste
(LLLW) transfer lines, and
the experimental Pilot Pit Area (Area 7811).7.3.3.3 WAG 5
WAG 5 contains 33 SWMUs, 13 of which are tanks that were used
to store LLLW prior to disposal by the hydrofracture process. WAG 5
also includes the surface facilities constructed in support of both the
old and new hydrofracture facilities. The largest land areas in
WAG 5 are devoted to SWSA 5 South and SWSA 5 North, the
TRU Waste Storage Area. The
remaining sites are support facilities for ORNL's hydrofracture
operations, two LLW pipeline leak/spill sites, and an impoundment in
SWSA 5 used to dewater sludge from the original Process Waste
Treatment Facility. Currently, LLW tanks at the New Hydrofracture
Facility are being used to store evaporator concentrates pending a
decision regarding ultimate disposal of these wastes.7.3.3.4 WAG 6
WAG 6 consists of four SWMUs: (1) SWSA 6,
(2) Building 7878, (3) the explosives detonation trench, and
(4) Building 7842. SWSA 6 is located in Melton Valley,
northwest of WOL and southeast
of Lagoon Road and Haw Ridge. The site is about 2 km
(1.2 miles) south of the main ORNL complex. Waste burials at the
68-acre site were initiated in 1973 when SWSA 5 was closed. Various
radioactive and chemical wastes were buried in trenches and auger holes.
SWSA 6 is the only currently operating disposal area for LLW at
ORNL. The emergency waste basin was constructed in 1961 to provide
storage of liquid wastes that could not be released from ORNL to WOC.
The basin is located northwest of SWSA 6 and has a capacity of
15 million gal, but has never been used. Radiological sampling of
the small drainage from the basin has shown the presence of some
radioactivity. The source of this contamination is not known.7.3.3.5 WAG 7
WAG 7 is located in Melton Valley about 1.6 km (1 mile)
south of the ORNL main plant area. The major sites in WAG 7 are the
seven pits and trenches used from 1951 to 1966 for disposal of LLLW.
WAG 7 also includes a decontamination facility, three leak sites, a
storage area containing shielded transfer tanks and other equipment, and
seven fuel wells used to dispose of acid solutions primarily containing
enriched uranium from Homogeneous Reactor Experiment fuel. WAG 7 is
being used to demonstrate the efficacy of In-Situ Vitrification
(ISV) technology to immobilize
radioactive waste streams buried in the WAG.7.3.3.6 WAGs 8 and 9
WAG 8 is located in Melton Valley, south of the main plant area,
and is composed of 36 SWMUs that are associated with the reactor
facilities in Melton Valley. The SWMUs consist of active LLLW collection
and storage tanks, leak/spill sites, a contractors' soils area,
radioactive waste ponds and impoundments, and chemical and sewage waste
treatment facilities. WAG 8 includes the Molten Salt Reactor
Experiment (MSRE) facility,
the High Flux Isotope Reactor, and the Radiochemical Engineering
Development Center. A removal action was conducted at the MSRE during
1995.7.3.3.7 WAG 10
WAG 10 consists of the Old Hydrofracture Facility
(OHF) grout sheets, New
Hydrofracture Facility, and New Hydrofracture grout sheets. The surface
facilities are associated with WAGs 5, 7, and 8.7.3.3.8 White Wing Scrap Yard (WAG 11)
The White Wing Scrap Yard (WAG 11), a largely wooded area of about
30 acres, is located in the McNew Hollow area on the western edge
of East Fork Ridge. It is 1.4 km (0.9 miles) east of the
junction of White Wing Road and the Oak Ridge Turnpike. Geologically,
the White Oak thrust fault bisects WAG 11. Lower-Cambrian-age
strata of the Rome Formation occur southwest of the fault and overlie
the younger Ordovician-age Chickamauga Limestone northeast of the fault.
There is only one SWMU in WAG 11.7.3.4 1995 Groundwater Quality Well Installation, Development, and Sampling Activities
Groundwater quality monitoring wells for the WAGs are designated as
hydraulically upgradient or downgradient (perimeter), depending on their
location relative to the general direction of groundwater flow.
Upgradient wells are located to provide groundwater samples that are not
expected to be affected by possible leakage from the site. Downgradient
wells are positioned along the perimeter of the site to detect possible
groundwater contaminant migration from the site. There are no
groundwater quality monitoring wells installed for the WAG 10 grout
sheets.7.3.5 ORNL Groundwater Quality
The following section describes the 1995 groundwater monitoring results
for the ORNL WAG perimeter monitoring network and the ORNL plant
perimeter surveillance (about 200 sampling events). In a few cases,
no samples could be collected because the wells were dry.7.3.6 Bethel Valley
7.3.6.1 WAG 1
In 1995, as in the past, radionuclides have been detected in a number of
WAG 1 wells, with gross beta activity and total radioactive
strontium above DWSs at a few (three) wells. The highest levels of
radioactivity have historically been observed in the same five wells:
one in the northwest WAG area and four in the southwest and western WAG
area. During 1995, four wells were unable to be sampled due to
construction activities, including two of the wells which historically
have had high levels of radioactivity. 7.3.6.2 WAG 3
Analytical results for 1995 at WAG 3 are similar to those obtained
in the previous 4 years. WAG 3 is located on a north-facing
slope, with its upgradient wells to the south. The long axis of the site
runs east to west; consequently, most of the downgradient wells are
along the northern border.7.3.6.3 WAG 17
WAG 17 is located on a northwest-facing slope, with its upgradient
wells on the eastern border and downgradient wells on the western
border. Although none of the wells had radiological levels above any
DWSs, the data for wells along the eastern and western boundaries show
evidence of radioactivity, including gross beta activity and
3H. In the past, gross alpha activity has exceeded the DWS at
two wells; however, this has not occurred in 1994 or 1995. The highest
gross alpha activity was 13 pCi/L; gross beta was 6.8 pCi/L;
total radioactive strontium was 5.4 pCi/L; and 3H was
8600 pCi/L.7.3.6.4 Exit Pathway
Historically, no wells in the East and West Bethel Valley exit pathways
have had VOC or radiological constituents detected above any DWSs. At
the East Bethel Valley surface-water location, neither VOCs nor
radiological constituents were detected above any DWS. In the West
Bethel Valley exit pathway, gross beta activity and total radioactive
strontium were detected above DWSs at the Raccoon Creek surface water
location, 145 and 67 pCi/L, respectively. One of the three wells in
the West Bethel Valley exit pathway has always been dry when sampled; a
second well was also dry at the time of the 1995 sampling.7.3.7 Melton Valley
7.3.7.1 WAG 2
At WAG 2, most of the downgradient wells are to the west and
downstream. The upgradient wells are to the east and upstream.
WAG 2 is influenced by other WAGs, and this seems to be reflected
in the analytical results. Major contributors of 3H and total
radioactive strontium to WAG 2 (in order of contribution) are
WAGs 5, 8, 9, 4, 1, 6, and 7.7.3.7.2 WAG 4
In 1995, as in the past, radionuclides (including gross beta activity,
total radioactive strontium, and 3H) have been detected in a
number of WAG 4 wells. The highest levels of radioactivity continue
to be observed in the same six wells along the eastern boundary. Gross
alpha activity at WAG 4 ranged from not being detected to
6.8 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta activity ranged from not
being detected to 1500 pCi/L (the DWS is 50 pCi/L); and
total radioactive strontium ranged from not being detected to
590 pCi/L (the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged from not being
detected to 7.8 � 106 pCi/L (the DWS is
20,000 pCi/L).7.3.7.3 WAG 5
The results for 1995 sampling are similar to results from previous
sampling events. WAG 5 contributes a significant percentage of the
3H and total radioactive strontium that exits the ORNL site
at WOD via Melton Branch. Tritium contamination is particularly
prevalent in one well on the southern and western boundaries, with
values as high as 3.2 � 108 pCi/L.7.3.7.4 WAG 6
Results obtained during 1995 were comparable to past results. VOC
contamination is apparently isolated in the area around a pair of wells
in the northeastern corner of the WAG. During 1995, carbon
tetrachloride, and trichloroethene were detected above DWSs at one of
these wells in every sampling event.7.3.7.5 WAG 7
In 1995, tritium was detected in more than half of the wells but was
highest in wells along the western perimeter next to SWSA 6.7.3.7.6 WAGs 8 and 9
The two upgradient wells are located north of the WAG s, two of the
downgradient wells are located northwest of the WAGs, two are located
south of WAG 8, and the remaining five are in WAG 8 west of
WAG 9 and in WAG 9. The analytical results for 1995 are
comparable to results from the previous years.7.3.7.7 Exit Pathway
In the Melton Valley exit pathway, WOC at WOD had gross beta activity
(170 pCi/L), total radioactive strontium (60 pCi/L), and
3H concentrations (27,000 pCi/L) detected above the
DWSs. One of the wells also had gross beta activity, total radioactive
strontium, and 3H concentrations detected above DWSs; a
second well had 3H concentrations detected above DWSs. This
is consistent with historical data in both cases. No VOCs were detected
above DWSs in either the wells or the surface-water location.7.3.7.8 White Wing Scrapyard (WAG 11)
WAG 11 has gently rolling terrain, and the upgradient wells are
located north, east, and south of the WAG. Gross alpha activity and
gross beta activity have been detected at low levels in wells along the
entire perimeter of the site, including the upgradient wells. Tritium
has been detected in some of the wells. No radiological constituents
were detected in 1995 above DWSs. Gross alpha activity ranged from not
being detected to 10 pCi/L (the DWS is 15 pCi/L); beta
activity ranged from not being detected to 21 pCi/L (the DWS is
50 pCi/L); and total radioactive strontium ranged from not being
detected to 4.1 pCi/L (the DWS is 8 pCi/L). Tritium ranged
from not being detected to 1000 pCi/L (the DWS is
20,000 pCi/L).7.3.7.9 Exit Pathway
In the White Wing Scrapyard exit pathway, one well had trichloroethene
levels above DWSs. None of the wells or the surface water location
considered in this exit pathway had radionuclide concentrations above
DWSs.7.3.8 Well Plugging and Abandonment at ORNL
The purpose of the ORNL well plugging and abandonment program is to
remove unneeded wells and boreholes as a possible source of
cross-contamination of groundwater from the surface or between
geological formations. Because of the complex geology and groundwater
pathways at ORNL, it has been necessary to drill many wells and
boreholes to establish the information base needed to predict
groundwater properties and behavior. However, many of the wells that
were established before the 1980s were not constructed satisfactorily to
serve current long-term monitoring requirements. Where existing wells do
not meet monitoring requirements, they become candidates for plugging
and abandonment.7.3.8.1 Wells Plugged During 1995
No wells were plugged and abandoned at ORNL during 1995. A total of
232 wells have been recommended for plugging and abandonment as
soon as funds are available.7.3.8.2 Methods Used
Plugging and abandonment is accomplished by splitting the existing well
casing and filling the casing and annular voids with grout or bentonite
to create a seal between the ground surface and water-bearing formations
and between naturally isolated water-bearing formations.7.4 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT THE K-25 SITE
7.4.1 Background and Hydrogeologic Setting
Groundwater effluent monitoring at the K-25 Site is focused
primarily on investigating and characterizing sites for remediation
under CERCLA. As a result of the
FFA and certification of
closure of the K-1407-B and C ponds, the principal driver at the
K-25 Site is CERCLA.7.4.2 Waste Area Groupings
The K-25 Site WAGs used for reporting groundwater-monitoring
results are described in the following sections and are indicated on
Fig. 7.21.7.4.2.1 South Main Plant Area
The south main plant area encompasses the southern area of the
K-25 Site and includes the K-1004-J vaults, the K-1004-L
UST, the K-1004-L
recirculating cooling water
(RCW) lines, the K-1004
cooling tower basin, the K-1004 laboratory drain, the K-1007-P1 pond,
and the K-1007 UST. Potential contaminants include heavy metals, acids,
organic solvents, other organic chemicals, and radionuclides.7.4.2.2 North Main Plant Area
The north main plant area encompasses the northeastern portion of the
K-25 Site and includes the K-1407-A neutralization pit, the former
K-1407-B and C ponds, the K-1407-C soil, the K-1700 stream (Mitchell
Branch), the K-1070-B old classified burial ground, the K-1401 acid
line, the K-1401 degreasers, the K-1401 basement, the K-1413
neutralization pit, the K-1420 building process lines, the K-1420 oil
storage area, the K-1420 incinerator, the K-1413 treatment tanks, the
K-1413 building and process lines, the K-1070-C/D classified burial
ground, the K-1070 concrete pad, the K-1070-D storage dikes, the K-1070
pits, and the K-1414 garage. The potential contaminants include organic
solvents, waste oils, heavy metals,
PCBs, and radionuclides.7.4.2.3 K-25 and K-1064 Area
The K-25 and K-1064 area encompasses the K-25 building and the area
north and northwest of the building. AOCs include the K-1066-J cylinder
storage yard, K-1024 dilution pit, K-1024 storage areas, K-1064 drum
storage and burn area, K-1064 drum deheading facility, and the K-802-B
and K-802-H cooling tower basins. Potential contaminants include waste
oils, heavy metals, organic solvents, and radionuclides.7.4.2.4 K-33 and K-31 Area
The K-33 and K-31 area encompasses the area around these two buildings
and includes the K-892-G, K-892-H, K-892-J, and K-862-E cooling tower
basins; the K-31 and K-33 RCW lines; and the K-762 and K-792
switchyards. Potential contaminants are primarily heavy metals, PCBs,
and radionuclides.7.4.2.5 K-27 and K-29 Area
The K-27 and K-29 area consists of the K-27/29 peninsula in the
southwestern portion of the main plant area. AOCs include the K-27 and
K-29 RCW lines, the K-832-H cooling tower basin, the K-732 switchyard,
the K-1410 neutralization pit, the K-1131 facility, the K-1232 chemical
recovery facility lagoon, and the K-1231 facility. The potential
contaminants include organic chemicals, heavy metals, PCBs, and
radionuclides.7.4.2.6 K-901 Area
The K-901 area encompasses the northwestern portion of the
K-25 Site and includes the K-1070-A burial ground, the K-1070-A
landfarm, the K-901-A holding pond, and the K-1066-K cylinder storage
yard. Potential contaminants are organic chemicals, heavy metals, PCBs,
and radionuclides.7.4.2.7 Duct Island Area
The Duct Island area consists of the K-1070-F peninsula on Poplar Creek
and contains the K-1070-F contractor's burial ground. Potential
contaminants are heavy metals, organic chemicals, and uranium.7.4.2.8 Powerhouse Area
The Powerhouse area borders the Clinch River in the southwestern portion
of the K-25 Site. AOCs include the K-770 scrap yard, the K-725
beryllium building, and the K-1085 firehouse burn area. The potential
contaminants are waste oils, organic chemicals, heavy metals, PCBs, and
radionuclides.7.4.3 1995 Well Installation and Plugging and Abandonment Activities
At the end of 1995 there were a total of 241 water quality
monitoring wells at the K-25 Site. Installation of 17 new
monitoring wells was completed in early 1995. These wells were installed
as part of the focused remedial investigation at the K-1070-A burial
ground in the K-901 area.7.4.4 1995 Groundwater Monitoring Program
In 1995 groundwater samples were collected at the K-25 Site from
200 monitoring wells during February, March, and April, and from
204 wells during September and October. Samples were collected
using micropurge and low-flow sampling procedures. Field measurements of
temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen,
oxidation/reduction potential, and turbidity were collected at each well
during sampling. The samples collected between February and April were
analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organic chemicals, metals,
radioactivity, pesticides, herbicides, PCBs, cyanide, and major ions.
Because of the results of the 1994 and spring 1995 sampling events, the
list of analytes was drastically reduced for the fall 1995 event as a
cost-savings initiative. At most wells, semivolatile organic chemicals,
pesticides, herbicides, PCBs, and cyanide were not detected and were
eliminated from the analyte list for sampling during the fall of 1995.
These analyses were sought in samples from the few wells where they had
been observed in the past.7.4.5 Postremediation Monitoring
Following completion of remedial actions at the former K-1407-B and C
ponds in 1995,
TDEC/DOE-OD and
EPA recommended continued
groundwater monitoring at two wells and one surface water location in
Mitchell Branch for evaluating the effectiveness of remedial action at
the site. The suite of analytes, consisting of constituents expected to
be present in the former ponds, includes several metals and
radiochemical parameters. Groundwater monitoring at the former K-1407-B
and C ponds commenced in the winter of 1996, to satisfy postremediation
requirements.7.4.6 Exit-Pathway Monitoring
Exit-pathway groundwater surveillance monitoring is conducted at points
where shallow groundwater flows from relatively large areas of the
K-25 Site and converges before discharging to surface water
locations. The exit-pathway groundwater surveillance network is
illustrated in Fig. 7.22. The eight-well network monitors both the unconsolidated zone and
bedrock and is supported by surface water monitoring at the weirs next
to the monitoring well locations. Groundwater samples were collected
from these wells during both of the 1995 sampling events.7.4.7 1995 Groundwater Monitoring Results
The following summary of the 1995 groundwater monitoring results focuses
on those constituents that were detected at concentrations exceeding
DWSs. The results are
presented separately for each WAG. The results of the 1995 sampling
program are consistent with historical results, which indicate that the
primary groundwater contaminants are
VOCs; to a lesser extent,
radioactivity is found in some areas. Detection of trace metals or
semivolatile organic chemicals is rare. The secondary DWSs for aluminum,
iron, and manganese were consistently exceeded in wells throughout the
K-25 Site because of the natural geochemical nature of the
groundwater underlying the site.7.4.7.1 South Main Plant Area
Groundwater samples were collected from 15 monitoring wells located
in the south main plant area during 1995. The primary groundwater
contaminants in this portion of the site are VOCs. The predominant VOC
detected in groundwater samples was trichloroethene, which exceeded the
DWS in 6 of the 15 wells sampled. The maximum concentration of
trichloroethene, 120 �g/L, was detected during the fall sampling
event in a bedrock well near the K-1004 laboratory. Tetrachloroethene
exceeded the DWS in two wells in the south main plant area with a
maximum concentration of 17 �g/L.7.4.7.2 North Main Plant Area
Groundwater samples from 96 monitoring wells in the north main
plant area were collected and analyzed in 1995. The primary contaminants
detected were VOCs and radioisotopes. Eleven VOCs exceeded their
respective DWSs in wells throughout the north main plant area. The most
widespread constituents were trichloroethene and its degradation product
(1,2-dichloroethene). Tricholoethene exceeded the DWS in 46 wells;
the maximum concentration of 11,000 �g/L was reported for a well in the
unconsolidated zone near the K-1070-C/D classified burial ground. The
highest concentration of any VOC was also reported for this well at
140,000 �g/L of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Other VOCs reported at
concentrations greater than 1000 �g/L were 1,1-dichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethene, toluene, and
1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane.7.4.7.3 K-25 and K-1064 Area
Groundwater samples were collected from 11 monitoring wells in the
K-25 and K-1064 area during 1995. The primary groundwater contaminants
detected were radioisotopes and VOCs. The predominant VOC detected,
trichloroethene, exceeded the DWS in two wells. The concentration of
trichloroethene ranged from 7 to 17 �g/L. Benzene also exceeded the
DWS at one well with a concentration of 6 �g/L.7.4.7.4 K-33 and K-31 Area
Groundwater samples were collected from 17 monitoring wells in the
K-33 and K-31 area during 1995. The primary contaminants detected were
VOCs and metals. Trichloroethene concentrations exceeding a DWS were
detected at two bedrock wells. Reported concentrations ranged from 10 to
43 �g/L. Additional VOCs detected in monitoring wells, but not
exceeding a DWS, include 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethene, methylene chloride, and toluene.7.4.7.5 K-27 and K-29 Area
Groundwater samples were collected from 18 monitoring wells in the
K-27 and K-29 area in 1995. VOCs were the primary contaminants detected.
Reported concentrations for five VOCs exceeded their respective DWSs:
1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, carbon tetrachloride,
trichloroethene, and vinyl chloride. Concentrations of trichloroethene,
the predominant VOC in this area, ranged from 6 �g/L at an
unconsolidated zone well to 860 �g/L in a bedrock well. Vinyl
chloride exceeded the DWS at two wells. The remaining VOCs exceeding
DWSs were detected at one well each.7.4.7.6 K-901 Area
Groundwater samples from 30 monitoring wells in the K-901 area were
collected and analyzed during 1995. The primary contaminants are VOCs
and radioisotopes.7.4.7.7 Duct Island Area
Groundwater samples were collected from five monitoring wells located in
the Duct Island area in 1995. Analytical results continue to indicate
that little groundwater contamination is associated with this area.7.4.7.8 Powerhouse Area
Groundwater samples were collected from 17 wells in the powerhouse
area during 1995. The primary groundwater contaminants detected were
radionuclides. Gross alpha activity exceeded the DWS at one well with
results ranging from 50 pCi/L to 56 pCi/L during the two
sampling events. Gross beta activity exceeded the reference value at two
monitoring wells in this area. Gross beta activities ranged from
141 pCi/L to 233 pCi/L at these two unconsolidated-zone
monitoring wells.7.4.7.9 K-25 Site Springs
Eight springs in and around the K-25 Site were sampled during the
spring of 1995. Two are located downgradient of known areas of waste
management activities at the K-25 Site. Six samples were obtained
in the fall of 1995 because two springs were dry at the time of sample
collection.7.4.8 1995 K-25 Site Exit-Pathway Monitoring Results
The K-25 Site exit-pathway monitoring network consists of eight
monitoring wells. Groundwater samples were collected from them in 1995.
The only metals detected above DWSs at the exit-pathway wells were
aluminum, iron, and manganese. The presence of these metals can be
attributed to the natural groundwater chemistry at the site. Several
VOCs were detected at exit-pathway wells, but none exceeded a DWS.