| Document Number | Title | Abstract | Date Received | Author | Document Link |
| DOE/OR/01-2992&D1 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Carl R. Froede, Jr., U.S. EPA, Region IV, re: EPA Comments of the Phased Construction Completion Report for Exposure Unit Z2-35 in Zone 2, East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (DOE/OR/01-2992& | EPA has completed its review of the subject document. Comments relevant to the review are provided and a resolution should be resolved before a revised document is submitted. | June 24, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/E.0521.059.0880.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-3001&D1 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Carl R. Froede, Jr., U.S. EPA, Region IV, re: EPA Comments on the Remedial Design Report/Remedial Action Work Plan for K-31/K-33 Area Groundwater at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, TN (DOE/OR/0 | EPA has reviewed the subject document. Comments relevant to the review are provided and should be resolved through comment resolution before a revised document is submitted. | June 26, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/E.0526.056.0092.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-2021&D5 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from John W.W. Sayer, U.S. EPA, Region IV, re: EPA Approval of the Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report for Environmental Monitoring at the EMWMF Facility, Oak Ridge, TN (DOE/OR/01-2021&D5)] | EPA has completed review of the subject document and approves the document. The report presents revised baseline data to be used for the EMWMF detection monitoring network to determine if there are impacts to the groundwater and surface water from EMWMF o | June 30, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0600.059.0959.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-2479&D1/A17 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, re: Addendum to the Removal Action Work Plan for the Y-12 Facilities Deactivation/Demolition Project, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Beta-4 Complex Pre-Demolition (DOE/OR/ | TDED has reviewed the subject document. Comments relevant to the review are provided. | July 1, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0614.058.0320.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-2021&D5 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, re: TDEC Approval: Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Environmental Monitoring at the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility, Oak Ridge, T | TDEC has reviewed the subject document. TDEC approves this document and supports prompt integration of the baseline/evaluation values into the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) detection monitoring program. | June 25, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0600.059.0958.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-3001&D1 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, re: TDEC Comments for the Remedial Design Report Remedial Action Work Plan for K-31/33 Area Groundwater at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennesse | TDEC has reviewed the subject document. Comments relevant to the review are provided. TDEC requests DOE schedule a meeting to discuss comment responses prior to submission of a D2 document. | June 20, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/E.0526.056.0091.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-2479&D1/A16 | [Letter to Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, re: Transmittal of the Addendum for the Removal Action Work Plan for the Y-12 Facilities Deactivation/Demolition Project, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Provisional Manage | TDEC has reviewed the subject document. While TDEC approval is not required for this specific document submittal, a comment relevant to the State's review is provided. | June 26, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0614.058.0319.pdf |
| | [Letter to Roger Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, from Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, re: Federal Facility Agreement Milestone Modification Request for the Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility Phased Construction Completion Report] | TDEC has reviewed the subject document for a milestone extension request. TDEC cannot approve a milestone that proposes extending the PCCR submission date by an additional five years and suggests extending the milestone for no more than three years remain | July 7, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0603.059.0913.pdf |
| | [Letter to Samantha Urquhart-Foster, U.S. EPA, Region IV, and Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, from Joanna G. Hardin, U.S. DOE-ORO, and Roger B. Petrie, U. S. DOE-ORO, re: Federal Facility Agreement Milestone Modification Request for the Outf | DOE requests the regulators' approval for a 1,826-day extension for submission of the subject document. The current milestone date is September 30, 2025, with a new requested milestone date of 2030. | June 25, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0603.059.0912.pdf |
| DOE/OR/01-2021&D5 | [Letter to Samantha Urquhart-Foster, U.S. EPA, Region IV, and Randy C. Young, TDEC, DOE Oversight Division, from Joanna G. Hardin, U.S. DOE-ORO, and Roger B. Petrie, U.S. DOE-ORO, re: Submittal of the Errata and Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report for | This letter transmits copies of the subject errata and the complete document for approval. | June 20, 2025 | | https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0600.059.0957.pdf |